Hammen C, Gitlin M
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095-160, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Jun;154(6):856-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.6.856.
Two questions were posed: Does stress precipitate episodes of bipolar I disorder, and does sensitivity to stress differ in episodes later in the course of illness compared to early ones?
Fifty-two patients with bipolar I disorder were followed longitudinally for up to 2 years; clinical course was monitored, and interview assessments of life events were made every 3 months.
The patients who had episodes of illness during follow-up had experienced significantly more severe stressors and more total stress in the preceding 6 months, and more total stress in the preceding 3 months, than those without episodes. Inconsistent with Post's stress "sensitization" hypothesis, patients with more prior episodes were more likely to have episodes following major stressors, and they relapsed more rapidly.
Stressors may precipitate episodes of bipolar illness, especially for patients with more prior episodes. Different versions of the stress sensitization model remain to be tested.
提出了两个问题:压力是否会引发双相I型障碍发作,以及与疾病早期发作相比,疾病后期发作对压力的敏感性是否存在差异?
对52例双相I型障碍患者进行了长达2年的纵向随访;监测临床病程,并每3个月进行一次生活事件访谈评估。
随访期间出现疾病发作的患者,在之前6个月经历的应激源明显更严重,总压力更大,在之前3个月的总压力也比未发作的患者更大。与波斯特的压力“致敏”假说不一致的是,既往发作次数较多的患者在遭受重大应激源后更易发作,且复发更快。
应激源可能引发双相情感障碍发作,尤其是对于既往发作次数较多的患者。压力致敏模型的不同版本仍有待检验。