Suppr超能文献

惊恐障碍患者与缺血性心脏病患者胸痛时的认知差异。

Differences in cognitions during chest pain of patients with panic disorder and ischemic heart disease.

作者信息

Fraenkel Y M, Kindler S, Melmed R N

机构信息

Talbieh Mental Health Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 1996;4(5):217-22. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1996)4:5<217::AID-DA2>3.0.CO;2-A.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A significant number of patients with chest pains who undergo coronary angiography (20-30%) have normal coronary arteries. Up to 50% of this group are eventually diagnosed as Panic Disorder and most continue to complain of their symptoms, in spite of the normal coronary angiogram. We hypothesized that the cognitions of panic disorder subjects on presentation with chest pain would differ from those of patients suffering from true angina pectoris.

METHODS

We investigated the cognitions associated with chest pain of three patient groups: proven symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD+), subjects with chest pain and a normal coronary angiogram (CAD-), and patients with panic disorder (PD). All patients were classified according to whether the symptomatology was, firstly, associated with frightening cognitions (during the episode), and, secondly, whether either these cognitions (cognitive predominance), or the physical symptom (physical predominance), dominated the clinical picture.

RESULTS

We observed that in the CAD+ group, 18% experienced frightening cognitions but in only 4% (2 of 66 patients) were the cognitions the dominant experience during the chest pain. In contrast, all the PD patients experienced frightening cognitions and in 83% of this group, the cognitions were the predominant experience. In the CAD- group, 48% were found to be PD compatible.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the cognitions of patients during episodes of chest pain, evaluated by three questions, help to differentiate between PD and true coronary symptoms. Consequently, the presence of frightening cognitions in the presence of chest pain, particularly at the onset of the clinical problem, makes necessary the need for psychiatric evaluation with the objective of excluding PD.

摘要

背景

大量接受冠状动脉造影的胸痛患者(20%-30%)冠状动脉正常。该组中高达50%的患者最终被诊断为惊恐障碍,尽管冠状动脉造影正常,但大多数患者仍继续诉说其症状。我们推测,惊恐障碍患者在出现胸痛时的认知与真正心绞痛患者的认知会有所不同。

方法

我们调查了三组患者胸痛相关的认知情况:经证实有症状的冠状动脉疾病(CAD+)、胸痛且冠状动脉造影正常的受试者(CAD-)以及惊恐障碍患者(PD)。所有患者首先根据症状是否与可怕的认知相关(发作期间)进行分类,其次根据这些认知(认知主导)或身体症状(身体主导)是否主导临床表现进行分类。

结果

我们观察到,在CAD+组中,18%的患者经历过可怕的认知,但在胸痛期间,只有4%(66例患者中的2例)的认知是主要体验。相比之下,所有PD患者都经历过可怕的认知,且该组中83%的患者,认知是主要体验。在CAD-组中,发现48%的患者符合PD标准。

结论

本研究表明,通过三个问题评估的患者在胸痛发作期间的认知有助于区分PD和真正的冠状动脉症状。因此,在胸痛存在时,尤其是在临床问题出现之初,存在可怕的认知就有必要进行精神科评估,以排除PD。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验