• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两家大学医院经尿道前列腺汽化术治疗膀胱出口梗阻

Transurethral vaporization of the prostate in the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction at two university hospitals.

作者信息

Gerber G S, Jahoda A, Bales G T, Albala D M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker, School of Medicine, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Tech Urol. 1997 Spring;3(1):25-9.

PMID:9170221
Abstract

Transurethral vaporization of the prostate (TVAP) is a new technique for the surgical treatment of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The primary advantage of TVAP appears to be shortened hospitalization and less bleeding than is associated with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Since February 1995, 66 consecutive men with bladder outlet obstruction (47 with persistent voiding symptoms and 19 in complete urinary retention) secondary to prostatic disease underwent TVAP at two university hospitals. TVAP was utilized in all patients regardless of prostate size. The mean length of follow-up was 3.2 months. All 19 men in complete retention were able to void adequately following surgery with a mean postvoid residual volume of 18cc and a mean International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) of 7.5. In the remaining patients, the I-PSS decreased from a mean of 19.6 to 8.4. Pre- and postoperative peak urinary flow rate data were available in 17 men and increased from 9 to 18 cc/s. Limited transurethral resection of prostatic tissue at the completion of TVAP was necessary to adequately relieve bladder outlet obstruction in 18% (12/66) of patients. Hospitalization of < 24 h was needed in 68% (45/66) patients. The urinary catheter was removed within 1 day of surgery in 68% (45/66) of men as well. Seven patients required catheter replacement postoperatively due to difficulty voiding (five men) or bleeding (two men). No patient required blood transfusion. TVAP is effective in relieving bladder outlet obstruction in men with and without urinary retention. The majority of patients require brief or no hospitalization and are able to void adequately within 24 h of surgery. TVAP appears to be less effective in men with large prostate glands, and limited TURP is more frequently needed in these cases. The long-term results of TVAP will require further study.

摘要

经尿道前列腺汽化术(TVAP)是一种治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)男性患者的新技术。TVAP的主要优点似乎是与经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)相比,住院时间缩短且出血更少。自1995年2月以来,两所大学医院连续对66例因前列腺疾病导致膀胱出口梗阻的男性患者(47例有持续性排尿症状,19例完全尿潴留)进行了TVAP治疗。所有患者无论前列腺大小均采用TVAP。平均随访时间为3.2个月。所有19例完全尿潴留的男性患者术后均能充分排尿,平均残余尿量为18cc,平均国际前列腺症状评分(I-PSS)为7.5。其余患者的I-PSS从平均19.6降至8.4。17例男性患者有术前和术后的最大尿流率数据,其最大尿流率从9cc/s增至18cc/s。在TVAP完成时,18%(12/66)的患者需要进行有限的经尿道前列腺组织切除术以充分解除膀胱出口梗阻。68%(45/66)的患者住院时间<24小时。68%(45/66)的男性患者在术后1天内拔除了导尿管。7例患者术后因排尿困难(5例男性)或出血(2例男性)需要更换导尿管。无患者需要输血。TVAP对有或无尿潴留的男性患者缓解膀胱出口梗阻均有效。大多数患者需要短暂住院或无需住院,且能在术后24小时内充分排尿。TVAP对前列腺较大的男性患者似乎效果较差,在这些病例中更常需要进行有限的TURP。TVAP的长期结果需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Transurethral vaporization of the prostate in the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction at two university hospitals.两家大学医院经尿道前列腺汽化术治疗膀胱出口梗阻
Tech Urol. 1997 Spring;3(1):25-9.
2
Efficacy of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy in alleviating medically refractory urinary retention due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.高能经尿道微波热疗缓解良性前列腺增生所致药物难治性尿潴留的疗效
Urology. 2004 Oct;64(4):703-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.074.
3
Transurethral resection versus incision of the prostate: a randomized, prospective study.经尿道前列腺切除术与前列腺切开术:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Urology. 1995 May;45(5):768-75. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80081-8.
4
A prospective randomized trial comparing transurethral prostatic resection and clean intermittent self-catheterization in men with chronic urinary retention.一项比较经尿道前列腺切除术与清洁间歇性自我导尿术治疗慢性尿潴留男性患者的前瞻性随机试验。
BJU Int. 2005 Jul;96(1):93-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05574.x.
5
Long-term results of contact laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with small or moderately enlarged prostates.接触式激光与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗前列腺轻度或中度增生的良性前列腺增生症的长期疗效比较
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;37(6):487-93. doi: 10.1080/00365590310015769.
6
Transurethral electrovaporization vs transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatic obstruction: a meta-analysis.经尿道电汽化术与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗症状性前列腺梗阻的Meta分析
BJU Int. 2004 Jul;94(1):89-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04907.x.
7
Feasibility of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for recurrent/residual benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)治疗复发性/残留良性前列腺增生(BPH)的可行性。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E845-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11290.x. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
8
High power diode laser vaporization of the prostate: preliminary results for benign prostatic hyperplasia.高功率二极管激光前列腺汽化术:良性前列腺增生的初步结果
J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1078-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.043. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
9
Urodynamics after TURP and HoLEP in urodynamically obstructed patients: are there any differences at 1 year of follow-up?经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)和铥激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)术后尿动力学梗阻患者的尿动力学情况:随访1年时是否存在差异?
Urology. 2006 Jun;67(6):1193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.036.
10
Laser prostatectomy with a TURPETTE: evolution with right-angle technique.使用TURPETTE的激光前列腺切除术:直角技术的进展
Tech Urol. 1995 Spring;1(1):11-8.