Gonen O, Rosen D J, Dolfin Z, Tepper R, Markov S, Fejgin M D
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir General Hospital, Kfar-Saba, Israel.
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;89(6):913-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00149-x.
Macrosomia at term is associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity, including a higher rate of cesarean delivery and shoulder dystocia. Induction of labor has been suggested as a means to prevent further weight gain and improve outcome. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not induction of labor in these cases improves maternal and neonatal outcome.
Patients at term with an ultrasonic fetal weight estimation of 4000-4500 g were prospectively randomized into two groups: induction of labor (group D and expectant management (group II). Patients with diabetes, a previous cesarean delivery, or nonvertex presentation were excluded. Outcome variables included mode of delivery, arterial cord pH, presence of shoulder dystocia, brachial plexus injury, clavicular fracture, cephalohematoma, and intraventricular hemorrhage.
Of 273 patients who were eligible for the study, 134 were randomized to group I and 139 to group II. Parity, gestational age, and fetal weight estimation were similar in the two groups. The neonates of group II patients were significantly heavier (4132.8 +/- 347.4 versus 4062.8 +/- 306.9 g; P = .024). The rate of cesarean delivery was 19.4% in group I and 21.6% in group II patients (not significant [NS]). Cord pH was similar in both groups. Shoulder dystocia was diagnosed in five group I and six group II patients (NS). None developed brachial plexus injury. There were two cases of mild, transient brachial plexus injury in group II patients without documented shoulder dystocia. Mild intraventricular hemorrhage was diagnosed in three of 44 group I and two of 31 group II neonates evaluated (NS).
In this prospective, randomized study, induction of labor for suspected macrosomia at term did not decrease the rate of cesarean delivery or reduce neonatal morbidity. Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight between 4000 and 4500 g should not be considered an indication for induction of labor.
足月巨大儿与孕产妇及新生儿发病率增加相关,包括剖宫产率和肩难产率升高。引产被认为是预防胎儿体重进一步增加并改善结局的一种方法。本研究的目的是确定在这些病例中引产是否能改善孕产妇及新生儿结局。
对超声估计胎儿体重为4000 - 4500g的足月患者进行前瞻性随机分组,分为引产组(I组)和期待治疗组(II组)。排除患有糖尿病、既往有剖宫产史或胎位异常的患者。结局变量包括分娩方式、脐动脉血pH值、肩难产、臂丛神经损伤、锁骨骨折、头颅血肿和脑室内出血。
在273例符合研究条件的患者中,134例被随机分为I组,139例分为II组。两组的产次、孕周和胎儿体重估计相似。II组患者的新生儿体重明显更重(4132.8±347.4g对4062.8±306.9g;P = 0.024)。I组患者的剖宫产率为19.4%,II组为21.6%(无显著差异[NS])。两组的脐动脉血pH值相似。I组有5例、II组有6例诊断为肩难产(无显著差异)。均未发生臂丛神经损伤。II组有2例患者发生轻度、短暂性臂丛神经损伤,无肩难产记录。在I组评估的44例新生儿中有3例、II组评估的31例新生儿中有2例诊断为轻度脑室内出血(无显著差异)。
在这项前瞻性随机研究中,足月疑似巨大儿引产并未降低剖宫产率或减少新生儿发病率。超声估计胎儿体重在4000至4500g之间不应被视为引产指征。