Willenheimer R B, Israelsson B A, Cline C M, Erhardt L R
Department of Cardiology, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden.
Scand Cardiovasc J. 1997;31(1):9-16. doi: 10.3109/14017439709058063.
Echocardiography is essential in the diagnosis of heart failure, but insufficient resources limit its use. We compared swift (five minutes) simplified echocardiography, using elementary equipment, with standard echocardiography (45 minutes), using advanced equipment. Visual semi-quantification of cardiac dimensions, valvular stenosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was performed in 100 consecutive patients with suspected or known heart failure. Agreement between simplified and standard echocardiography was 78-89% regarding semi-quantification of cardiac dimensions, and 95-98% for valvular stenosis (present/not present). Sensitivity and specificity for simplified echocardiography to identify patients with LVEF < 0.40 was 86 and 89%, respectively. Simplified echocardiography using elementary equipment could be an alternative to standard echocardiography in the diagnosis of heart failure. The cost and time saved by using simplified echocardiography allows for more patients to be examined, which should be weighed against its accuracy.
超声心动图对心力衰竭的诊断至关重要,但资源不足限制了其应用。我们将使用基本设备的快速(五分钟)简化超声心动图与使用先进设备的标准超声心动图(45分钟)进行了比较。对100例疑似或已知心力衰竭的连续患者进行了心脏大小、瓣膜狭窄和左心室射血分数(LVEF)的视觉半定量分析。简化超声心动图与标准超声心动图在心脏大小半定量方面的一致性为78-89%,瓣膜狭窄(存在/不存在)方面为95-98%。简化超声心动图识别LVEF<0.40患者的敏感性和特异性分别为86%和89%。在心力衰竭诊断中,使用基本设备的简化超声心动图可作为标准超声心动图的替代方法。使用简化超声心动图节省的成本和时间使得能够检查更多患者,这应与其准确性相权衡。