• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[超声体重评估的准确性——头先露与臀先露的比较]

[Accuracy of ultrasound weight assessment--comparison of vertex vs. breech presentation].

作者信息

Ragosch V, Entezami M, Hundertmark S, Mutz A, Becker R, Weitzel H

机构信息

Universitätfrauenklinik im Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, Freien Universität Berlin.

出版信息

Ultraschall Med. 1997 Feb;18(1):19-25. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1000510.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1000510
PMID:9173522
Abstract

AIM

To determine the quality of prenatal sonographic weight estimation, comparing breech and vertex presentations.

METHOD

In 147 breech presentations (BP) and 149 vertex presentations (VP), the biparietal head diameter (BPD), the fronto-occipital head diameter (FOD) and the transverse abdominal diameter (ATD) were measured. From these data, the weight was estimated, using Shepard's formula before 28 weeks and Hansmann's thereafter, and compared to the delivery weight. Both formula were modified to incorporate the virtual BPD (vBPD), derived from the BPD, FOD and the calculated head circumference. In the BP group, the role of examiner skills was evaluated, comparing the accuracy of experienced (DEGUM II qualifications) and average individuals.

RESULTS

The accuracy for BP was nearly identical to that for VP (= 0.915 vs. = 0.929). The examiners' qualifications had a detectable but not significant influence on the results (= 0.942 vs. = 0.892).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound measurements yield comparable results in both BP and VP, if the vBPD is used. In our opinion, ultrasonic weight estimation is a useful adjunct when determining the manner of delivery in BP.

摘要

目的

比较臀位和头位,确定产前超声体重估计的质量。

方法

对147例臀位(BP)和149例头位(VP)测量双顶径(BPD)、枕额径(FOD)和腹横径(ATD)。根据这些数据,在28周前使用谢泼德公式、之后使用汉斯曼公式估计体重,并与出生体重进行比较。两种公式均进行了修改,纳入了从BPD、FOD和计算出的头围得出的虚拟双顶径(vBPD)。在BP组中,比较经验丰富者(具备德国妇产超声学会二级资质)和普通人员的准确性,评估检查者技能的作用。

结果

BP的准确性与VP几乎相同(分别为0.915和0.929)。检查者资质对结果有可察觉但不显著的影响(分别为0.942和0.892)。

结论

如果使用vBPD,超声测量在BP和VP中产生的结果相当。我们认为,超声体重估计在确定BP的分娩方式时是一种有用的辅助手段。

相似文献

1
[Accuracy of ultrasound weight assessment--comparison of vertex vs. breech presentation].[超声体重评估的准确性——头先露与臀先露的比较]
Ultraschall Med. 1997 Feb;18(1):19-25. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1000510.
2
[The value of prepartal ultrasound estimation of birth weight in breech presentation].[产前超声估计臀先露胎儿出生体重的价值]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1992 May;52(5):264-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1023746.
3
Comparison of the accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation by using the various equations.使用各种公式对超声估计胎儿体重的准确性进行比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Sep;85(9):962-7.
4
Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasound measurement. II. Clinical application of a new formula.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61(4):307-12.
5
Maternal and fetal factors in breech presentation.臀先露的母胎因素
Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jul;64(1):55-9.
6
Intrapartum assessment by house staff of birth weight among twins.住院医师对双胞胎出生体重的产时评估。
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;82(4 Pt 1):523-6.
7
[Behavior of fetal position in the 2d half of pregnancy in labor with breech and vertex presentations].
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1987 May;47(5):341-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035833.
8
Residual amniotic fluid volume in preterm rupture of membranes: association with fetal presentation and incidence of clinical and histologic evidence of infection.胎膜早破时羊水残余量:与胎儿先露及感染的临床和组织学证据发生率的关联
Am J Perinatol. 1997 Mar;14(3):125-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994111.
9
Estimating birth weight in twins. Comparison of eight sonographic models.估算双胞胎的出生体重。八种超声模型的比较。
J Reprod Med. 1996 Jun;41(6):403-8.
10
[Vertex presentation in the morning--breech presentation at noon: a nursery tale? A prospective study of 1,019 patients].
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1989 Apr;49(4):363-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1026601.