Suppr超能文献

通过高变DNA区域扩增早期检测骨髓植入。

Early detection of bone marrow engraftment by amplification of hypervariable DNA regions.

作者信息

Martinelli G, Trabetti E, Farabegoli P, Testoni N, Bandini G, Motta M R, Vittone A, Terragna C, Pignatti P F, Tura S

机构信息

Institute of Hematology and Medical Oncology Seragnoli, University of Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Haematologica. 1997 Mar-Apr;82(2):156-60.

PMID:9175318
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

After allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) it is important to be able to distinguish between the host and donor origin of cells in order to monitor the engraftment process. However, identifying whether the hematopoietic stem cells are of donor or recipient origin may be a difficult task. DNA studies using Southern blotting techniques or the amplification by PCR of regions in the human genome with high polymorphic neutral sequence variation showing Mendelian inheritance as variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) can detect the origin of host bone marrow after BMT. We have tried to apply these sensitive systems of detection to the early stages of BMT when small numbers of regenerated cells are available for analysis.

METHODS

We used in vitro polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of three single-locus simple repetitive DNA sequences, all of which vary extensively in their repeat number among different individuals (VNTR D1S80, ApoB, and D17S5), to evaluate post transplant engraftment in six patients who showed no signs of peripheral blood engraftment at 2-3 weeks after transplant. We tested 2 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), 2 with B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), 1 with T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), and 1 with aplastic anemia (SAA), all in prolonged aplasia following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT).

RESULTS

In a sequential analysis protocol with the different loci, the donor was distinguishable from the recipient in all pairs with at least one of the three markers used. After 16 days (median 16.2; range 15 to 20 days) we found that complete chimerism was present in 5 patients: 4 of donor origin (= engraftment) and one of host origin (= rejection), this last case being one of mixed chimerism. In the 2 cases in which the presence (one complete and one partial) of host DNA was detected, rejection of the donor bone marrow followed, and in 1 patient a second BMT was necessary. The other 4 patients with complete chimerism of donor origin achieved hematological reconstitution and we documented complete engraftment of donor bone marrow a few months later.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing PCR to document early post-transplant engraftment and chimerism in the first month after BMT has the advantage over Southern blotting of being more sensitive and requiring small amounts of sample. It may also be useful for guiding subsequent therapeutic decisions.

摘要

背景与目的

异基因骨髓移植(BMT)后,区分细胞的宿主来源和供体来源对于监测植入过程非常重要。然而,确定造血干细胞是供体来源还是受体来源可能是一项艰巨的任务。使用Southern印迹技术进行的DNA研究或通过PCR扩增人类基因组中具有高度多态性中性序列变异且呈现孟德尔遗传(如可变数目串联重复序列,VNTR)的区域,能够检测BMT后宿主骨髓的来源。我们试图将这些灵敏的检测系统应用于BMT的早期阶段,此时仅有少量再生细胞可供分析。

方法

我们使用体外聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增三个单基因座简单重复DNA序列,这三个序列在不同个体中的重复数目差异很大(VNTR D1S80、ApoB和D17S5),以评估6例在移植后2 - 3周无外周血植入迹象的患者的移植后植入情况。我们检测了2例慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者、2例B系急性淋巴细胞白血病(B - ALL)患者、1例T系急性淋巴细胞白血病(T - ALL)患者和1例再生障碍性贫血(SAA)患者,所有患者均处于异基因骨髓移植(BMT)后的长期再生障碍状态。

结果

在对不同基因座进行的序列分析方案中,使用的三个标记物中至少有一个时,所有配对中供体和受体均可区分。16天后(中位数16.2;范围15至20天),我们发现5例患者存在完全嵌合:4例为供体来源(=植入),1例为宿主来源(=排斥),最后一例为混合嵌合。在检测到宿主DNA存在(1例完全存在和1例部分存在)的2例患者中,随后出现了供体骨髓排斥,其中1例患者需要进行第二次BMT。其他4例供体来源完全嵌合的患者实现了血液学重建,几个月后我们记录到供体骨髓完全植入。

解读与结论

利用PCR记录BMT后第一个月的早期移植后植入和嵌合情况,相较于Southern印迹技术具有更灵敏且所需样本量少的优势。它可能也有助于指导后续的治疗决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验