Lipp O V, Siddle D A, Dall P J
Department of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Psychophysiology. 1997 May;34(3):340-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02404.x.
Emotional accounts of startle modulation predict that startle is facilitated if elicited during aversive foreground stimuli. Attentional accounts hold that startle is enhanced if startle-eliciting stimulus and foreground stimulus are in the same modality. Visual and acoustic foreground stimuli and acoustic startle probes were employed in aversive differential conditioning and in a stimulus discrimination task. Differential conditioning was evident in electrodermal responses and blink latency shortening in both modalities, but effects on magnitude facilitation were found only for visual stimuli. In the discrimination task, skin conductance responses, blink latency shortening, and blink magnitude facilitation were larger during to-be-attended stimuli regardless of stimulus modality. The present results support the notion that attention and emotion can affect blink startle modulation during foreground stimuli.
关于惊吓调制的情绪理论预测,如果在厌恶前景刺激期间引发惊吓,惊吓会得到促进。注意力理论认为,如果引发惊吓的刺激和前景刺激处于相同模态,惊吓会增强。在厌恶辨别条件反射和刺激辨别任务中使用了视觉和听觉前景刺激以及听觉惊吓探针。在两种模态下,辨别条件反射在皮肤电反应和眨眼潜伏期缩短方面都很明显,但仅在视觉刺激中发现对幅度促进的影响。在辨别任务中,无论刺激模态如何,在需要关注的刺激期间,皮肤电导反应、眨眼潜伏期缩短和眨眼幅度促进都更大。目前的结果支持这样一种观点,即注意力和情绪可以在前景刺激期间影响眨眼惊吓调制。