Suppr超能文献

正常受试者对L-精氨酸和L-赖氨酸输注的血流动力学及生化反应:L-精氨酸诱导的血管舒张不能用阳离子氨基酸的非特异性作用来解释。

Haemodynamic and biochemical responses to L-arginine and L-lysine infusions in normal subjects: L-arginine-induced vasodilatation cannot be explained by non-specific effects of cationic amino acids.

作者信息

Smulders R A, Aarsen M, Teerlink T, De Vries P M, Van Kamp G J, Donker A J, Stehouwer C D

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Institute for Cardiovascular Research Vrije Universiteit (ICaR-VU), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Sci (Lond). 1997 Apr;92(4):367-74. doi: 10.1042/cs0920367.

Abstract
  1. Pharmacological stimulation of the synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) may be important in the prevention or treatment of cardiovascular diseases. 2. There is much discussion as to whether the precursor of NO, L-arginine, is able to stimulate basal endothelial NO production. L-Arginine is known to have vasodilating effects. However, it is not clear whether L-arginine-induced vasodilatation is attributable to an increase in NO production or to other systemic effects of L-arginine. 3. To investigate further the mechanisms of the L-arginine-induced vasodilatation, we compared the responses to L-arginine with those to saline and L-lysine in healthy subjects. L-Lysine is not a substrate for NO synthesis, but shares many of L-arginine's other properties. 4. During L-arginine infusion, blood pressure decreased [systolic blood pressure from 120.2 (SD 8.8) to 117.3 (12.1) mmHg (P = 0.05); diastolic blood pressure from 65.3 (5.9) to 61.6 (7.9) mmHg (P < 0.01)], and heart rate and extracellular fluid volume increased. The total peripheral vascular resistance decreased during L-arginine infusion by 18.0 (11.4)% (P < or = 0.05 compared with baseline and compared with L-lysine infusion). These results indicate vasodilation. No changes were observed during L-lysine and saline infusion. 5. Plasma cyclic GMP (the second messenger for NO) increased during L-arginine but also during L-lysine infusion [from 5.7 (1.2) to 6.8 (1.7) nmol/l (P < 0.01), and from 5.8 (1.8) to 7.0 (2.9) nmol/l (P < 0.05) respectively]. Plasma L-citrulline (a by-product of NO synthesis from L-arginine) increased during L-arginine infusion from 30.6 (7.5) to 47.1 (9.9) mumol/l (P < 0.001), but also during L-lysine infusion from 32.7 (6.5) to 42.0 (8.3) mumol/l (P < 0.001). 6. Plasma electrolytes and atrial natriuretic peptide concentrations responded similarly to L-arginine and L-lysine infusion, indicating similar effects on osmolality, plasma volume expansion and potassium distribution. 7. In conclusion, although L-lysine infusion had effects that were similar to those of L-arginine infusion, no vasodilatation was observed. Therefore, these effects cannot account for the L-arginine-induced vasodilatation. This finding indirectly supports the hypothesis that the vasodilatation during L-arginine infusion might be mediated by an increase in NO synthesis. If so, our data suggest that the presumed markers for NO synthesis, plasma cyclic GMP and L-citrulline concentrations, do not accurately reflect this increase. Instead, the rise in plasma cyclic GMP may be related to the rise in ANP. The rise in L-citrulline may be related to competition with L-arginine for the same cell membrane transport mechanism and to stimulation of the urea cycle.
摘要
  1. 对一氧化氮(NO)合成进行药理刺激在预防或治疗心血管疾病中可能具有重要意义。2. 关于NO的前体L-精氨酸是否能够刺激内皮细胞基础NO生成存在诸多讨论。已知L-精氨酸具有血管舒张作用。然而,尚不清楚L-精氨酸诱导的血管舒张是归因于NO生成增加还是L-精氨酸的其他全身效应。3. 为了进一步研究L-精氨酸诱导血管舒张的机制,我们在健康受试者中比较了对L-精氨酸与生理盐水和L-赖氨酸的反应。L-赖氨酸不是NO合成的底物,但具有L-精氨酸的许多其他特性。4. 在输注L-精氨酸期间,血压下降[收缩压从120.2(标准差8.8)降至117.3(12.1)mmHg(P = 0.05);舒张压从65.3(5.9)降至61.6(7.9)mmHg(P < 0.01)],心率和细胞外液量增加。在输注L-精氨酸期间,总外周血管阻力下降了18.0(11.4)%(与基线以及与输注L-赖氨酸相比,P ≤ 0.05)。这些结果表明血管舒张。在输注L-赖氨酸和生理盐水期间未观察到变化。5. 血浆环磷酸鸟苷(NO的第二信使)在输注L-精氨酸期间增加,但在输注L-赖氨酸期间也增加[分别从5.7(1.2)增至6.8(1.7)nmol/l(P < 0.01),以及从5.8(1.8)增至7.0(2.9)nmol/l(P < 0.05)]。血浆L-瓜氨酸(L-精氨酸合成NO的副产物)在输注L-精氨酸期间从30.6(7.5)增至47.1(9.9)μmol/l(P < 0.001),但在输注L-赖氨酸期间也从32.7(6.5)增至42.0(8.3)μmol/l(P < 0.001)。6. 血浆电解质和心房利钠肽浓度对输注L-精氨酸和L-赖氨酸的反应相似,表明对渗透压、血浆容量扩张和钾分布有相似影响。7. 总之,尽管输注L-赖氨酸产生的效应与输注L-精氨酸相似,但未观察到血管舒张。因此,这些效应不能解释L-精氨酸诱导的血管舒张。这一发现间接支持了以下假说,即输注L-精氨酸期间的血管舒张可能由NO合成增加介导。如果是这样,我们的数据表明,假定的NO合成标志物血浆环磷酸鸟苷和L-瓜氨酸浓度并不能准确反映这种增加。相反,血浆环磷酸鸟苷的升高可能与心房利钠肽的升高有关。L-瓜氨酸的升高可能与与L-精氨酸竞争相同的细胞膜转运机制以及对尿素循环的刺激有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验