Bulpitt C J, Palmer A J, Beevers D G, Coles E C, Ledingham J G, Petrie J C, Webster J
Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
J Hum Hypertens. 1997 Apr;11(4):205-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000406.
A case control study has reported a 60% higher risk of myocardial infarction in hypertensives treated with a calcium channel blocker (CCB). We examined the Department of Health Hypertension Care Computing Project (DHCCP) data to see if we could confirm or refute this suggestion.
Two case control studies, matched and unmatched, plus two longitudinal studies from 1 year of presentation, one for all subjects given a CCB for more than 1 year compared with those not given this drug, and the second comparing survival on the different drugs initially given between 3 and 12 months of follow-up.
A total of 9328 subjects were included in the analyses and 2154 died. Of these, 6406 received one or more of the following index drugs: 26% a calcium channel blocker (CCB); 84% a diuretic; 29% alpha methyldopa; 12% a beta-blocker (BB); and 11% an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. The CCBs were nifedipine, diltiazem or verapamil.
In the case control studies a group given diuretics +/- other treatments (but not including one of the index drugs) provided a reference group with a relative risk (RR) of 1.0. In the matched case control study the adjusted RR for a CCB without a diuretic was 1.32 (95% CI 0.64-2.70) for IHD mortality and 1.05 (95% CI 0.60-1.84) for cardiovascular mortality. Similar results were observed for methyldopa, BBs and ACE inhibitors. The results in the unmatched case control analysis were also similar. The longitudinal study comparing all those treated for over 1 year with a CCB with all other treatments showed a RR for total mortality of 1.03 (95% CI 0.85-1.25). The longitudinal study of total mortality according to treatment initiated at 3-12 months found results of a similar magnitude for CCBs, methyldopa and BBs.
The reference diuretic group had less severe cardiovascular disease than other groups. Treatment with a CCB, BB or methyldopa was associated with an excess mortality in comparison with this reference group. The excess was similar in the different drug groups.
一项病例对照研究报告称,使用钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)治疗的高血压患者发生心肌梗死的风险高出60%。我们分析了卫生部高血压护理计算项目(DHCCP)的数据,以确定能否证实或反驳这一说法。
两项病例对照研究,一项匹配,一项不匹配,外加两项自就诊起为期1年的纵向研究,一项针对所有服用CCB超过1年的受试者与未服用该药的受试者进行比较,另一项比较随访3至12个月期间最初服用不同药物的患者的生存率。
共有9328名受试者纳入分析,2154人死亡。其中,6406人接受了以下一种或多种索引药物治疗:26%接受钙通道阻滞剂(CCB);84%接受利尿剂;29%接受甲基多巴;12%接受β受体阻滞剂(BB);11%接受血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂。CCB类药物为硝苯地平、地尔硫䓬或维拉帕米。
在病例对照研究中,接受利尿剂加/减其他治疗(但不包括索引药物之一)的一组作为参照组,相对风险(RR)为1.0。在匹配病例对照研究中,未使用利尿剂的CCB治疗组的缺血性心脏病死亡率调整RR为1.32(95%CI 0.64 - 2.70),心血管疾病死亡率调整RR为1.05(95%CI 0.60 - 1.84)。甲基多巴、BB和ACE抑制剂也观察到类似结果。不匹配病例对照分析的结果也相似。将所有接受CCB治疗超过1年的患者与所有其他治疗患者进行比较的纵向研究显示,总死亡率的RR为1.03(95%CI 0.85 - 1.25)。根据3至12个月开始的治疗进行的总死亡率纵向研究发现,CCB、甲基多巴和BB的结果幅度相似。
参照利尿剂组的心血管疾病不如其他组严重。与该参照组相比,使用CCB、BB或甲基多巴治疗与死亡率过高相关。不同药物组的过高死亡率相似。