Rüffer U, Nultsch W
Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany.
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1997;37(2):111-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1997)37:2<111::AID-CM3>3.0.CO;2-B.
Phototaxis in wild-type Chlamydomonas cells is probably the result of four single photoresponses in the flagella, inverse in the cis (near the eyespot) and in the trans flagellum and also inverse by step-up (increase of) and step-down (decrease of) light stimulation as experienced by the eyespot during rotation of the cell [Rüffer and Nultsch, 1991: Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 18:269-278]. Two inverse sets of the four responses are supposed to be the cause for positive and negative phototaxis. The relevant flagellar responses consist of shifts of the front amplitude of the breaststroke beats. As single flagellar responses cannot be called "phototactic" they are termed "breaststroke flagellar photoresponses." The mutant strain ptx1 is defective in phototaxis but displays photoshocks [Horst and Witman, 1993: J. Cell Biol. 120:733-741]. Analysis of flagellar beat patterns in high-speed records of ptx1 cells held on micropipettes shows that breaststroke flagellar photoresponses exist in this mutant in spite of the loss of phototaxis. It is the cis/trans differentiation that is lost in ptx1: both flagella always respond in the same way and not inversely as in wild-type cells. Equal shifts of beat amplitude cannot cause a turn of the cell, which explains why phototaxis is not seen in ptx1 and supports the model suggested for positive and negative phototactic steering. In wild-type cells front amplitude changes are connected with beat period changes, which also occur in ptx1 cells and suggest that both flagella respond like wild-type trans flagella. Divergencies in the shock response of ptx1 cells, beat period reduction, and coordination changes may support the notion that cis flagellar specialization is lost and that ptx1 possesses, so to speak, two trans and no cis flagellum. Therefore, the mutant strain ptx1 might be useful for studying molecular and functional peculiarities of the two flagella.
野生型衣藻细胞的趋光性可能是鞭毛中四种单一光反应的结果,在顺式鞭毛(靠近眼点)和反式鞭毛中相反,并且在细胞旋转过程中眼点所经历的光刺激增强(增加)和减弱(减少)时也相反[鲁弗尔和努尔茨,1991年:《细胞运动与细胞骨架》18:269 - 278]。这四种反应的两组相反情况被认为是正向和负向趋光性的原因。相关的鞭毛反应包括蛙泳式摆动前端幅度的变化。由于单一的鞭毛反应不能被称为“趋光性的”,所以它们被称为“蛙泳式鞭毛光反应”。突变株ptx1在趋光性方面存在缺陷,但会表现出光休克现象[霍斯特和威特曼,1993年:《细胞生物学杂志》120:733 - 741]。对固定在微吸管上的ptx1细胞的高速记录中的鞭毛摆动模式分析表明,尽管ptx1失去了趋光性,但这种突变体中仍然存在蛙泳式鞭毛光反应。在ptx1中失去的是顺式/反式分化:两条鞭毛总是以相同的方式做出反应,而不像野生型细胞那样相反。摆动幅度的同等变化不会导致细胞转向,这就解释了为什么在ptx1中看不到趋光性,并支持了为正向和负向趋光性转向所提出的模型。在野生型细胞中,前端幅度变化与摆动周期变化相关,这在ptx1细胞中也会发生,这表明两条鞭毛的反应方式类似于野生型的反式鞭毛。ptx1细胞在休克反应、摆动周期缩短和协调变化方面的差异可能支持这样一种观点,即顺式鞭毛特化丧失,并且可以说ptx1拥有两条反式鞭毛而没有顺式鞭毛。因此,突变株ptx1可能有助于研究两条鞭毛的分子和功能特性。