Muers M F, Middleton W G, Gibson G J, Prescott R J, Mitchell D N, Connolly C K, Harrison B D
British Thoracic Society Research Committee, UK.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 1997 Mar;14(1):46-56.
We used a simple semi-quantitative radiographic scoring system for a controlled prospective study of long term corticosteroids in pulmonary sarcoidosis, conducted by the British Thoracic Society.
Radiographic opacities were described in 4 categories: reticulo-nodular shadows [R], mass opacities [M], confluence [C], and shadows associated with possible pulmonary fibrosis [F]. The extent of each type was scored on a 0-4 scale by quartiles, and profusion by a 0-4 scale as absent, minimal (just perceptible), mild moderate or gross. Combined scores for each film were derived by multiplying the extent and profusion for each type of opacity. In the study 149 patients were examined at entry and periodically over a 5-year period. Using the whole study population we examined the relationship between the radiographic scores for extent and profusion, how predominant types change with time and how the scores correlated with other indices of disease severity.
R was the predominant abnormality throughout the study with a strong correlation between extent and profusion. Significant correlations in the expected directions were demonstrated between the R and F scores and a dyspnoea score, spirometry and TLCO, both at study entry, after 6 months and after 5 years. Similarly, there were significant relations between changes in spirometry and TLCO over five years and changes in R and F Scores.
This scoring system would seem to be suitable, perhaps after further validation work, for other prospective clinical studies.
我们采用了一种简单的半定量放射学评分系统,用于英国胸科学会开展的一项关于肺结节病长期使用皮质类固醇的对照前瞻性研究。
放射学不透明度分为4类:网状结节阴影[R]、块状不透明度[M]、融合[C]以及与可能的肺纤维化相关的阴影[F]。每种类型的范围按四分位数在0至4分的量表上评分,而渗出量按无、极少(刚可察觉)、轻度、中度或重度在0至4分的量表上评分。每张胸片的综合评分通过将每种不透明度类型的范围和渗出量得分相乘得出。在该研究中,149例患者在入组时以及在5年期间定期接受检查。我们利用整个研究人群,研究了放射学评分在范围和渗出量方面的关系、主要类型如何随时间变化以及评分与疾病严重程度的其他指标如何相关。
在整个研究过程中,R是主要异常,范围和渗出量之间存在强相关性。在研究入组时、6个月后和5年后,R和F评分与呼吸困难评分、肺功能测定和肺一氧化碳弥散量(TLCO)之间均呈现出预期方向的显著相关性。同样,肺功能测定和TLCO在5年期间的变化与R和F评分的变化之间也存在显著关系。
这个评分系统似乎是合适的,或许在经过进一步验证工作之后,可用于其他前瞻性临床研究。