• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死的预后因素

Prognostic factors in acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Kennelly B M, Margolis B

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 1977 Sep 17;52(13):511-4.

PMID:918792
Abstract

The hospital courses of 882 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU) during a 3-year period were evaluated. Their courses after discharge from the CCU were assessed with reference to the following serious complications which had occurred during their stay in the CCU; ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, second-or third-degree heart block, pulmonary oedema, cardiogenic shock persistent sinus tachycardia, persistent hypotension, atrial flutter or fibrillation, or extension, or extension of infarction. Of the 494 patients (56%) with one or more of these complications, 38 (8%) died of cardiac causes in hospital after transfer from the CCU. Of 388 patients (44%) in the uncomplicated group, only 2(0,5%) died of cardiac causes after transfer from the CCU. The same patients were classified according to the Coronary Prognostic Index (CPI) of Norris. None of the 54% of patients with a CPI of less than 6 units died in hospital after transfer from the CCU. It is proposed that patients with a CPI of less than 6 units and with none of the listed serious complications during their CCU stay could safely be discharged from hospital earlier than is customary.

摘要

对连续3年入住冠心病监护病房(CCU)的882例急性心肌梗死患者的住院病程进行了评估。参照他们在CCU住院期间发生的以下严重并发症,对其从CCU出院后的病程进行了评估:室性心动过速或颤动、二度或三度房室传导阻滞、肺水肿、心源性休克、持续性窦性心动过速、持续性低血压、心房扑动或颤动,或梗死扩展。在有上述一种或多种并发症的494例患者(56%)中,38例(8%)从CCU转出后在医院死于心脏原因。在无并发症组的388例患者(44%)中,只有2例(0.5%)从CCU转出后死于心脏原因。根据诺里斯的冠状动脉预后指数(CPI)对相同患者进行分类。CPI小于6分的患者中,54%从CCU转出后均未在医院死亡。建议CPI小于6分且在CCU住院期间无上述所列严重并发症的患者,可以比常规情况更早安全出院。

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死的预后因素
S Afr Med J. 1977 Sep 17;52(13):511-4.
2
[Short and intermediate term clinical outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with aortic counterpulsation].[主动脉反搏治疗心源性休克患者的短期和中期临床结局]
G Ital Cardiol. 1996 Dec;26(12):1385-99.
3
Acute myocardial infarction in women. The influence of age on complications and mortality.
Med J Aust. 1978 Feb 25;1(4):189-91.
4
Unexpected readmissions to the coronary-care unit during recovery from acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死恢复期间意外再次入住冠心病监护病房。
N Engl J Med. 1981 Mar 12;304(11):625-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198103123041101.
5
[Coronary care units-early discharge and telemetry].[冠心病监护病房——早期出院与遥测技术]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1982 Aug 14;112(33):1141-4.
6
Ventricular arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction. A comparative study on some tests for ventricular arrhythmias.急性心肌梗死中的室性心律失常。关于室性心律失常一些检测方法的比较研究。
Acta Med Scand. 1977 Jan;201(1-2):119-25.
7
[Identification of patients with acute myocardial infarction that may be discharged early: prospective evaluation with simple clinical and instrumental indicators].[急性心肌梗死患者早期出院可能性的识别:采用简单临床和仪器指标的前瞻性评估]
Ital Heart J Suppl. 2001 Jul;2(7):775-82.
8
The course of acute myocardial infarction. Feasibility of early discharge of the uncomplicated patient.急性心肌梗死的病程。病情不复杂患者早期出院的可行性。
Circulation. 1975 Mar;51(3):410-3. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.51.3.410.
9
Criteria for early discharge after acute myocardial infarction: validation in a community hospital.急性心肌梗死后早期出院标准:在社区医院的验证
Arch Intern Med. 1982 Jan;142(1):39-41.
10
Coronary care unit utilization in Hamilton, Ontario, a city of 375,000 people.安大略省汉密尔顿市(人口37.5万)冠心病监护病房的使用情况。
Can J Cardiol. 1988 Jan-Feb;4(1):25-32.

引用本文的文献

1
A computerized report form for the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (Cardiac Computer Report - B.M. Kennelly).心脏重症监护病房的计算机报告表(心脏计算机报告 - B.M. 肯内利)。
Intensive Care Med. 1980;6(1):9-17. doi: 10.1007/BF01683075.