van Kuijk W H, Hillion D, Savoiu C, Leunissen K M
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997 Jun;8(6):949-55. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V86949.
Impaired vascular reactivity during combined ultrafiltration-hemodialysis (UF+HD) compared with hemofiltration (HF) remains a rather enigmatic problem, the causes of which are still not well understood. Although a number of factors have been claimed to be responsible, most recent studies point to a major role of the extracorporeal blood temperature, which is usually lower during HF compared with UF + HD. However, previous studies in which hemodynamics were studied during UF + HD and HF in relation to the extracorporeal blood temperature are limited by the use of acetate in UF + HD, and measurements were often confined to BP and heart rate. Therefore, arterial BP, as well as forearm vascular resistance (FVR) and venous tone (strain-gauge plethysmography), was measured in 11 hemodialysis patients during 3 h UF + HD (37.5 degrees C) and predilution HF (39.0 degrees C = warm HF), resulting in equivalent extracorporeal blood temperatures. Patients were also studied during cold HF at an infusate temperature of 36.0 degrees C. UF + HD and HF were matched with respect to the dialysate and infusate composition (bicarbonate), bio-compatibility factors, and small molecule clearance. At equivalent temperatures, UF + HD and HF were associated with a comparable vascular and BP response. Only cold HF was associated with a significant increase in FVR. In addition, FVR and venous tone, as well as arterial BP, were all significantly higher during cold HF compared with both UF + HD and warm HF. These results indicate that the disparity in vascular reactivity between UF + HD and HF is primarily related to differences in the extracorporeal blood temperature.
与血液滤过(HF)相比,联合超滤-血液透析(UF+HD)期间血管反应性受损仍然是一个相当神秘的问题,其原因仍未得到很好的理解。尽管有许多因素被认为与此有关,但最近的研究指出体外血液温度起主要作用,与UF+HD相比,HF期间的体外血液温度通常较低。然而,以往关于UF+HD和HF期间血流动力学与体外血液温度关系的研究受到UF+HD中使用醋酸盐的限制,测量通常仅限于血压和心率。因此,在11例血液透析患者中,于3小时的UF+HD(37.5摄氏度)和预稀释HF(39.0摄氏度=温热HF)期间测量动脉血压、前臂血管阻力(FVR)和静脉张力(应变片体积描记法),使体外血液温度相等。还在灌注液温度为36.0摄氏度的冷HF期间对患者进行了研究。UF+HD和HF在透析液和灌注液成分(碳酸氢盐)、生物相容性因素和小分子清除率方面进行了匹配。在相同温度下,UF+HD和HF的血管和血压反应相当。只有冷HF与FVR显著增加有关。此外,与UF+HD和温热HF相比,冷HF期间的FVR、静脉张力以及动脉血压均显著更高。这些结果表明,UF+HD和HF之间血管反应性的差异主要与体外血液温度的差异有关。