Suppr超能文献

阿片类神经肽强啡肽A(1-13)的人体药理学

Human pharmacology of the opioid neuropeptide dynorphin A(1-13).

作者信息

Greenwald M K, Stitzer M L, Haberny K A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Jun;281(3):1154-63.

PMID:9190848
Abstract

We evaluated the human pharmacology of dynorphin A(1-13) and determined whether this peptide can modulate naloxone-precipitated withdrawal effects. Such information could help determine its receptor mechanism of action and whether dynorphin is useful for treating opioid dependence. Six opioid-experienced subjects participated in a within-subject, placebo-controlled design. There were two phases, each with four test sessions. In phase 1, volunteers who were not physically dependent were administered 0, 0.1, 0.32 and 1 mg/kg dynorphin (15-min i.v. infusion) in ascending order, and subjective, observer-rated and physiological effects were monitored. Dynorphin produced brief, dose-related increases in drug effect ratings with both good and bad drug effects reported by different subjects. There were no significant changes in pupil size, respiratory rate, skin temperature, heart rate or blood pressure, These data are consistent with preclinical findings that dynorphin has a short duration of action and does not primarily exert its direct effects through mu-opioid receptors. In four separate sessions of phase 2, acute morphine pretreatment (45 mg/70 kg i.m.) was followed 15 or 18 hr later by dynorphin (0 vs. 1 mg/kg, 15-min i.v.) and then naloxone (1 or 3 vs. 10 mg/70 kg, 5-min i.v.). Under these conditions, dynorphin weakly potentiated naloxone-precipitated withdrawal. These data contrast with those of previous preclinical studies showing dependence-attenuating effects of dynorphin and fail to support its use as an antiwithdrawal agent in humans.

摘要

我们评估了强啡肽A(1-13)的人体药理学特性,并确定该肽是否能调节纳洛酮诱发的戒断效应。此类信息有助于确定其受体作用机制以及强啡肽是否可用于治疗阿片类药物依赖。六名有阿片类药物使用经验的受试者参与了一项自身对照、安慰剂对照设计的研究。研究分为两个阶段,每个阶段有四个测试环节。在第一阶段,对未出现身体依赖的志愿者按升序分别静脉输注0、0.1、0.32和1mg/kg强啡肽(持续15分钟),并监测主观、观察者评分及生理效应。强啡肽产生了短暂的、与剂量相关的药物效应评分增加,不同受试者报告了良好和不良的药物效应。瞳孔大小、呼吸频率、皮肤温度、心率或血压均无显著变化。这些数据与临床前研究结果一致,即强啡肽作用持续时间短,且并非主要通过μ阿片受体发挥直接作用。在第二阶段的四个独立环节中,先对受试者进行急性吗啡预处理(45mg/70kg,肌肉注射),15或18小时后静脉输注强啡肽(0或1mg/kg,持续15分钟),然后静脉输注纳洛酮(1或3与10mg/70kg,持续5分钟)。在这些条件下,强啡肽对纳洛酮诱发的戒断效应仅有微弱的增强作用。这些数据与之前临床前研究中显示强啡肽具有减轻依赖作用的数据形成对比,且不支持其在人体中用作抗戒断药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验