Suppr超能文献

出院摘要中的《国际疾病分类,第九次修订本,临床修订版》编码并不能很好地衡量内科住院患者并发症的发生情况。

International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes in discharge abstracts are poor measures of complication occurrence in medical inpatients.

作者信息

Geraci J M, Ashton C M, Kuykendall D H, Johnson M L, Wu L

机构信息

Houston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies, Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 1997 Jun;35(6):589-602. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199706000-00005.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The authors tested the ability of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes in discharge abstracts to identify medical inpatients who experienced an in-hospital complication, using complications identified through chart review as the gold standard.

METHODS

Two sets of ICD-9-CM codes were used: an inclusive set including many medical diagnoses that may also be coexistent complicating conditions on admission rather than complications and an exclusive set consisting primarily of ICD-9-CM-specified complication and adverse drug event codes.

RESULTS

Neither set performed well as a diagnostic test for complication occurrence according to receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC areas were 0.61 for the inclusive set and 0.55 for the exclusive set). Sensitivities of the ICD-9-CM codes for complications were 0.34 for the inclusive set and 0.14 for the exclusive set. Corresponding positive predictive values were 0.32 and 0.37, respectively. Sensitivities of code definitions for individual complications were generally poor, less than 0.5 in most cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that ICD-9-CM codes in discharge abstracts are poor measures of complication occurrence.

摘要

目的

作者以通过病历审查确定的并发症为金标准,测试出院摘要中的《国际疾病分类,第九版,临床修订本》(ICD - 9 - CM)编码识别发生院内并发症的内科住院患者的能力。

方法

使用了两组ICD - 9 - CM编码:一组包含许多医疗诊断,这些诊断在入院时可能也是并存的合并症而非并发症;另一组主要由ICD - 9 - CM规定的并发症和药物不良事件编码组成。

结果

根据受试者工作特征分析(ROC曲线下面积,包含组为0.61,排除组为0.55),两组作为并发症发生的诊断测试表现均不佳。ICD - 9 - CM编码对并发症的敏感度,包含组为0.34,排除组为0.14。相应的阳性预测值分别为0.32和0.37。各个并发症编码定义的敏感度普遍较差,多数情况下低于0.5。

结论

作者得出结论,出院摘要中的ICD - 9 - CM编码对并发症发生情况的衡量效果不佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验