Valachovic R W
Harvard School of Dental Medicine, USA.
J Dent Educ. 1997 May;61(5):434-6.
Clinical practice requires a sound foundation in the basic and clinical sciences. However, the traditional dental curriculum often separates the two in a variety of ways that reduce their integration. The basic sciences are commonly taught in the first two years by a basic science faculty with inconsistent integration with clinical dental practice. The clinical sciences are often taught by faculty who may not be actively involved in research-related activities. The curriculum is dense and is difficult to modify to adapt to evolving scientific discovery and application. The 1995 IOM report focuses much of its attention on these issues. The Harvard School of Dental Medicine has dramatically modified its curriculum twice in the recent past to more closely integrate the basic and clinical sciences and to promote the clinical relevance of the basic sciences. The class entering in 1980 began a five-year D.M.D. program that was designed to decompress the curriculum and increase experiences that enhance scientific and clinical integration. The class entering in 1994 initiated a four-year program that uses a problem-based learning design throughout the entire curriculum. Strategies for integrating the clinical and the basic sciences along with research training and experience were developed and implemented in both programs.
临床实践需要扎实的基础科学和临床科学基础。然而,传统的牙科课程常常以各种方式将两者分开,从而降低了它们的整合度。基础科学通常在前两年由基础科学教师授课,与临床牙科实践的整合不一致。临床科学往往由可能未积极参与研究相关活动的教师授课。课程内容密集,难以修改以适应不断发展的科学发现和应用。1995年医学研究所在报告中重点关注了这些问题。哈佛牙医学院最近两次对其课程进行了大幅修改,以更紧密地整合基础科学和临床科学,并提高基础科学的临床相关性。1980年入学的班级开始了一个为期五年的牙医学博士项目,该项目旨在减轻课程负担,并增加增强科学与临床整合的体验。1994年入学的班级启动了一个为期四年的项目,该项目在整个课程中采用基于问题的学习设计。在这两个项目中都制定并实施了整合临床科学与基础科学以及研究培训和经验的策略。