Suppr超能文献

憩室病非择期手术中的术中结肠灌洗

Intraoperative colonic lavage in nonelective surgery for diverticular disease.

作者信息

Lee E C, Murray J J, Coller J A, Roberts P L, Schoetz D J

机构信息

Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Hitchcock Clinic, Burlington, Massachusetts 01805, USA.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Jun;40(6):669-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02140895.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Staged resection of the sigmoid colon has been the traditional strategy for treating patients who require nonelective surgery to manage complications of diverticular disease. Resection and primary anastomosis has not generally been recommended when the clinical setting is compromised by contiguous inflammation or inadequate mechanical cleansing of the colon because of concerns regarding the potential risk of anastomotic dehiscence. Although many reports have confirmed that intraoperative colonic lavage (ICL) is a safe method for relieving fecal loading of the colon to facilitate primary intestinal anastomosis in patients with mechanical obstruction of the distal colon, there is very limited experience with the use of this technique in treating acute inflammatory disorders of the colon. In this report, we present our results with ICL in the nonelective treatment of patients with complications of diverticulitis.

METHODS

Records of all patients undergoing urgent operations at the Lahey Clinic to treat complications of diverticular disease from July 1987 to January 1996 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 62 patients who required nonelective operations, 33 underwent ICL in an attempt to perform primary anastomosis. In five patients, the operation included creation of a colostomy. The indication for surgery was obstruction in 13 patients (39 percent), persistent abscess or phlegmon in 13 (39 percent), perforation in 6 patients (18 percent), and hemorrhage in 1 patient (3 percent). According to Hinchey's classification system, 18 patients had Stage I disease, 10 had Stage II, and 5 patients had Stage III disease. There were no patients with Stage IV disease. The single anastomotic complication in the series was responsible for the sole operative mortality. The morbidity rate of 42 percent, included three intraoperative complications (2 splenic injuries and 1 ureteral laceration), two intra-abdominal abscesses (6 percent), and six wound infections (18 percent).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, ICL has proven to be a safe method for accomplishing single-stage resection of the colon in selected patients with diverticulitis who require an urgent operation. When there is no evidence of diffuse purulent or feculent peritonitis, we believe this is the preferred method for treating patients who are hemodynamically stable.

摘要

背景

对于需要进行非选择性手术以处理憩室病并发症的患者,分期切除乙状结肠一直是传统的治疗策略。当临床情况因临近炎症或结肠机械性清洁不充分而受到影响时,一般不建议进行切除及一期吻合术,因为担心存在吻合口裂开的潜在风险。尽管许多报告证实术中结肠灌洗(ICL)是一种安全的方法,可减轻结肠的粪便负荷,以利于远端结肠机械性梗阻患者进行一期肠吻合,但在治疗结肠急性炎症性疾病中使用该技术的经验非常有限。在本报告中,我们介绍了ICL在非选择性治疗憩室炎并发症患者中的结果。

方法

回顾了1987年7月至1996年1月在Lahey诊所接受紧急手术治疗憩室病并发症的所有患者的记录。

结果

在62例需要进行非选择性手术的患者中,33例接受了ICL以尝试进行一期吻合术。5例患者的手术包括造口术。手术指征为梗阻13例(39%)、持续性脓肿或蜂窝织炎13例(39%)、穿孔6例(18%)、出血1例(3%)。根据欣奇(Hinchey)分类系统,18例患者为I期疾病,10例为II期,5例为III期疾病。无IV期疾病患者。该系列中唯一的吻合口并发症导致了唯一的手术死亡。发病率为42%,包括3例术中并发症(2例脾损伤和1例输尿管撕裂)、2例腹腔内脓肿(6%)和6例伤口感染(18%)。

结论

根据我们的经验,对于需要紧急手术的特定憩室炎患者,ICL已被证明是一种安全的方法,可完成结肠的一期切除。当没有弥漫性脓性或粪性腹膜炎的证据时,我们认为这是治疗血流动力学稳定患者的首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验