Schenck R C, Blaschak M J, Lance E D, Turturro T C, Holmes C F
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio 78284-7774, USA.
Arthroscopy. 1997 Jun;13(3):285-90. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90022-0.
We evaluated the outcome of and compared two rehabilitation programs (clinic-based versus home) after a mid-third patellar autograft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Thirty-seven patients (28 male, 9 female; average age, 24.1 years) completed the study. Fifteen of these patients received clinic-based rehabilitation (three visits per week for 6 weeks prescribed), and 22 patients received home-based physical therapy (number of visits determined by patient response). Knee ROM, Lysholm, Visual Analogy Scale, (VAS) pain rating, hop test, KT-1000, and Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. All patients reported good satisfaction with the function of their knee at average follow-up of 21.6 months (range, 12 to 48). Patients managed by home rehabilitation averaged 2.85 visits as compared with 14.2 for clinic-centered patient (P < .05). There were no differences in functional or subjective outcomes in the different postoperative rehabilitation regimens, with both groups reporting high satisfaction and improved quality of life. Cost savings in the home rehabilitation group were significant.
我们评估了前交叉韧带髌腱中1/3自体移植重建术后两种康复方案(门诊康复与居家康复)的效果并进行了比较。37例患者(28例男性,9例女性;平均年龄24.1岁)完成了该研究。其中15例患者接受门诊康复(按处方每周就诊3次,共6周),22例患者接受居家物理治疗(就诊次数由患者反应决定)。术前及术后评估膝关节活动度(ROM)、Lysholm评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、单腿跳测试、KT-1000以及疾病影响量表(SIP)。所有患者在平均21.6个月(范围12至48个月)的随访中均对膝关节功能表示高度满意。接受居家康复的患者平均就诊2.85次,而以门诊为中心康复的患者平均就诊14.2次(P < .05)。不同术后康复方案在功能或主观结果方面无差异,两组均报告高度满意且生活质量得到改善。居家康复组的成本节约显著。