Suppr超能文献

多种药物(劳拉西泮、三唑仑、唑吡坦和佐匹克隆)治疗情境性失眠的多导睡眠图分析:基于周期性交替模式的研究

Multidrug comparison (lorazepam, triazolam, zolpidem, and zopiclone) in situational insomnia: polysomnographic analysis by means of the cyclic alternating pattern.

作者信息

Parrino L, Boselli M, Spaggiari M C, Smerieri A, Terzano M G

机构信息

Institute of Neurology, University of Parma, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Neuropharmacol. 1997 Jun;20(3):253-63. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199706000-00010.

Abstract

Since homogeneous samples of insomniacs are difficult to recruit for pharmacotherapy studies, normal sleepers can be used to assess the protective effect of hypnotic drugs, under standardized nonconducive conditions. In particular, a noisy environment is a typical cause of situational insomnia that can be counteracted by a sedative-hypnotic agent. Six healthy middle-aged subjects (three men and three women), with no complaints about sleep, underwent a completely randomized double-blind series of 10 nocturnal polysomnograms with at least 72-h washout intervals. All subjects received a single dose of placebo, zolpidem 10 mg, zopiclone 7.5 mg, lorazepam 1 mg, and triazolam 0.25 mg both under basal and under perturbed conditions. For each individual, five recordings were carried out under basal conditions (sound pressure level not higher than 30 dB) and five recordings under acoustically perturbed conditions (continuous white noise at 55 dB). Sleep quality was assessed by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS). All recordings were scored according to conventional rules (macro-structure) and cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) methodology (microstructure). Statistical analysis was based on a repeated measures analysis-of-variance design integrated by Bonferroni adjusted probabilities. Under placebo, situational insomnia was confirmed by the significant increase in sleep fragmentation (intrasleep wakefulness) and by the significant enhancement of arousal instability (CAP parameters). In contrast to macrostructural information, CAP parameters were highly sensitive in detecting the perturbing effects of noise (mean CAP rate under placebo, 57%) and the protective action of hypnotic drugs during perturbation (mean CAP rate under active medication, 41%). Microstructural analysis enabled us to discriminate hypnotic drugs from placebo, nonbenzodiazepine compounds from benzodiazepine agents, and zopiclone from zolpidem. The latter, in fact, induced the lowest values of CAP rate both under basal (30%) and under noisy (39%) conditions and determined a significant decrease in electroencephalogram arousals. All CAP parameters were significantly correlated with the visual-analogue-scale scores for sleep quality. The use of CAP methodology in a highly standardized model of situational insomnia can be a valid alternative to conventional sleep scoring for the investigation of drug effects on disturbed sleep.

摘要

由于难以招募到用于药物治疗研究的失眠症患者同质样本,因此可以在标准化的不利条件下,使用正常睡眠者来评估催眠药物的保护作用。特别是,嘈杂的环境是情境性失眠的典型原因,而镇静催眠药可以抵消这种影响。六名无睡眠问题的健康中年受试者(三名男性和三名女性),接受了一系列完全随机的双盲夜间多导睡眠图检查,共10次,每次检查之间至少间隔72小时的洗脱期。所有受试者在基础条件和干扰条件下均接受单剂量的安慰剂、10毫克唑吡坦、7.5毫克佐匹克隆、1毫克劳拉西泮和0.25毫克三唑仑。对于每个个体,在基础条件下(声压级不高于30分贝)进行5次记录,在声学干扰条件下(55分贝的连续白噪声)进行5次记录。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估睡眠质量。所有记录均按照常规规则(宏观结构)和循环交替模式(CAP)方法(微观结构)进行评分。统计分析基于重复测量方差分析设计,并采用Bonferroni校正概率。在安慰剂作用下,睡眠片段化(睡眠中觉醒)显著增加以及觉醒不稳定性(CAP参数)显著增强,证实了情境性失眠的存在。与宏观结构信息不同,CAP参数在检测噪声的干扰作用(安慰剂下的平均CAP率为57%)以及催眠药物在干扰期间的保护作用(活性药物下的平均CAP率为41%)方面非常敏感。微观结构分析使我们能够区分催眠药物与安慰剂、非苯二氮䓬类化合物与苯二氮䓬类药物以及佐匹克隆与唑吡坦。事实上,唑吡坦在基础条件下(30%)和嘈杂条件下(39%)均诱导出最低的CAP率值,并导致脑电图觉醒显著减少。所有CAP参数均与睡眠质量的视觉模拟量表评分显著相关。在高度标准化的情境性失眠模型中使用CAP方法,对于研究药物对睡眠障碍的影响而言,可能是一种替代传统睡眠评分的有效方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验