Humphries B J, Newton R U, Abernethy P J, Blake K D
Centre For Exercise Science and Sports Management, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(6):532-6. doi: 10.1007/s004210050200.
The relative content of myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms IIb, IIa and I in human skeletal muscle taken from the m. vastus lateralis of 30 healthy male subjects was analysed using mini-gel electrophoresis. Repeated electrophoretic gels utilizing the same methods were produced for all subjects and the determination of MHC protein bands was performed using a digital scanner and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Image software and laser densitometry. A comparison between the NIH Image processing technique and laser densitometry revealed differences of 6.47%, 6.35% and 6.84% between these measurement techniques for MHC-IIb, -IIa and -I isoforms, respectively. The percentage technical error of measurement (TEM%) between electrophoretic gels was shown to be 19.1%, 17.8% and 14.2%, with regard to percentage of occurrence of MHC-IIb, -IIa and -I isoforms respectively. The variation in electrophoretic gel analyses was shown to be 5.7%, 7.3% and 5.5%, with regard to the percentage of MHC-IIb, -IIa and -I isoforms respectively. Intra-class correlations comparing NIH Image and laser densitometry produced r values in the range 0.38-0.63. Comparisons between and within gel analyses produced r values in the range 0.59-0.94 and 0.93-0.98, respectively. Analyses of variance revealed no significant differences (P < 0.05) between analysis techniques, between gels or within gels for the measurement of MHC-IIb, -IIa and -I isoforms. The inter-gel error between fibre subgroups was moderate for the two type-II MHC populations and less for type-I MHC; the intra-individual error in the measuring technique used for classifying the MHC-IIb, -IIa and -I protein bands was small. The results obtained in this investigation showed consistent trends which may reflect a false classification of the type-II MHC populations for the inter-gel and intra-individual analyses. The NIH Image software and digitizing process was shown to be a valid and reliable method for distinguishing between MHC protein bands of human skeletal tissue as separated by mini-gel electrophoretic techniques.
采用微型凝胶电泳分析了30名健康男性受试者股外侧肌中肌球蛋白重链(MHC)IIb、IIa和I亚型的相对含量。为所有受试者制作了使用相同方法的重复电泳凝胶,并使用数字扫描仪、美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)图像软件和激光密度测定法对MHC蛋白条带进行测定。NIH图像处理技术与激光密度测定法之间的比较显示,对于MHC-IIb、-IIa和-I亚型,这些测量技术之间的差异分别为6.47%、6.35%和6.84%。就MHC-IIb、-IIa和-I亚型的出现百分比而言,电泳凝胶之间的测量技术误差百分比(TEM%)分别为19.1%、17.8%和14.2%。电泳凝胶分析的变异分别为MHC-IIb、-IIa和-I亚型百分比的5.7%、7.3%和5.5%。比较NIH图像和激光密度测定法的组内相关性产生的r值在0.38 - 0.63范围内。凝胶分析之间和凝胶分析内部的比较产生的r值分别在0.59 - 0.94和0.93 - 0.98范围内。方差分析显示,在分析技术之间、凝胶之间或凝胶内部,对于MHC-IIb、-IIa和-I亚型的测量没有显著差异(P < 0.05)。对于两种II型MHC群体,纤维亚组之间的凝胶间误差适中,对于I型MHC则较小;用于分类MHC-IIb、-IIa和-I蛋白条带的测量技术中的个体内误差较小。本研究获得的结果显示出一致的趋势,这可能反映了在凝胶间和个体内分析中II型MHC群体的错误分类。NIH图像软件和数字化过程被证明是一种有效且可靠的方法,用于区分通过微型凝胶电泳技术分离的人体骨骼肌组织的MHC蛋白条带。