Kondakor I, Lehmann D, Michel C M, Brandeis D, Kochi K
KEY Institute for Brain-Mind Research, University Hospital of Psychiatry, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 1997;104(2-3):161-73. doi: 10.1007/BF01273178.
The influence of the immediate prestimulus EEG microstate (sub-second epoch of stable topography/map landscape) on the map landscape of visually evoked 47-channel event-related potential (ERP) microstates was examined using the frequent, non-target stimuli of a cognitive paradigm (12 volunteers). For the two frequent prestimulus microstate classes (oriented left anterior-right posterior and right anterior-left posterior), ERP map series were selectively averaged. The post-stimulus ERP grand average map series was segmented into microstates; 10 were found. The centroid locations of positive and negative map areas extracted as landscape descriptors. Significant differences (MANOVAs and t-tests) between the two prestimulus classes were found in four of the ten ERP microstates. The relative orientation of the two ERP microstate classes was the same as prestimulus in some ERP microstates, but reversed in others. Thus, brain electric microstates at stimulus arrival influence the landscapes of the post-stimulus ERP maps and therefore, information processing; prestimulus microstate effects differed for different post-stimulus ERP microstates.
使用认知范式中的频繁非目标刺激(12名志愿者),研究了即时刺激前脑电图微状态(稳定地形/图谱景观的亚秒级时段)对视觉诱发的47通道事件相关电位(ERP)微状态图谱景观的影响。对于两种频繁的刺激前微状态类别(左前 - 右后定向和右前 - 左后定向),ERP图谱系列被选择性地平均。刺激后的ERP总体平均图谱系列被分割为微状态;共发现10个微状态。提取正性和负性图谱区域的质心位置作为景观描述符。在十个ERP微状态中的四个中发现了两种刺激前类别之间的显著差异(多变量方差分析和t检验)。在一些ERP微状态中,两种ERP微状态类别的相对方向与刺激前相同,但在其他微状态中则相反。因此,刺激到达时的脑电微状态会影响刺激后ERP图谱的景观,进而影响信息处理;不同刺激后ERP微状态的刺激前微状态效应有所不同。