Ryu O H, Hu C C, Simmer J P
University of Texas School of Dentistry, Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Pediatric Dentistry 78284-7888, USA.
Adv Dent Res. 1996 Nov;10(2):150-8. doi: 10.1177/08959374960100020601.
The primary structures of amelogenins expressed from different genes vary because of DNA sequence divergence and variations in alternative RNA splicing. The pattern of splicing is unique for each amelogenin gene yet investigated, even when two copies of the gene are expressed in the same cell. Despite the high conservation of amelogenin sequences, diversity in the pattern of RNA splicing leads to significant differences in the number and character of amelogenin isoforms in the developing enamel matrix. Since conservation of molecular structure is an indicator of functional significance, we compared enamel protein preparations from rat, porcine, rabbit, and opossum developing tooth organs. Enamel extracts were fractionated by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Western blot analyses were performed with polyclonal antibodies raised against recombinant murine amelogenin and the polypeptide encoded by murine exon 4. The opossum enamel extract produced the simplest chromatogram, suggesting that fewer proteins are secreted into the developing enamel matrix. The predominant opossum amelogenin has an apparent molecular mass of 28 kDa and reacts strongly with the recombinant amelogenin antibody but is not recognized by the murine exon 4 antibody. Opossum amelogenin mRNA was amplified with murine amelogenin primers specific for the amino- and carboxyl-terminal coding regions. The mobility of the amplification products on 4% agarose gels indicates that the leucine-rich amelogenin polypeptide (LRAP) is expressed in the opossum and that the major amelogenin is larger than its homologue in the mouse. We conclude that the alternative splicing of amelogenins pre-dates the metatherian and eutherian divergence over 100 million years ago.
由于DNA序列差异以及可变RNA剪接的变化,不同基因表达的釉原蛋白的一级结构有所不同。即使两个基因拷贝在同一细胞中表达,每个已研究的釉原蛋白基因的剪接模式也是独特的。尽管釉原蛋白序列具有高度保守性,但RNA剪接模式的多样性导致发育中的釉质基质中釉原蛋白异构体的数量和特征存在显著差异。由于分子结构的保守性是功能重要性的一个指标,我们比较了大鼠、猪、兔和负鼠发育中的牙齿器官的釉质蛋白制剂。通过反相高效液相色谱(HPLC)对釉质提取物进行分级分离,并通过十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)进行分析。使用针对重组小鼠釉原蛋白和小鼠外显子4编码的多肽产生的多克隆抗体进行蛋白质印迹分析。负鼠釉质提取物产生的色谱图最简单,这表明分泌到发育中的釉质基质中的蛋白质较少。主要的负鼠釉原蛋白的表观分子量为28 kDa,与重组釉原蛋白抗体强烈反应,但不被小鼠外显子4抗体识别。用针对氨基和羧基末端编码区的小鼠釉原蛋白引物扩增负鼠釉原蛋白mRNA。扩增产物在4%琼脂糖凝胶上的迁移率表明富含亮氨酸的釉原蛋白多肽(LRAP)在负鼠中表达,并且主要的釉原蛋白比其在小鼠中的同源物更大。我们得出结论,釉原蛋白的可变剪接在超过1亿年前有袋类和真兽类分化之前就已存在。