Suppr超能文献

不同合金制成的赫氏锉、S锉和U锉在锉削运动中的切割效率。

Cutting efficiency of Hedstrom, S and U files made of various alloys in filing motion.

作者信息

Schäfer E, Tepel J

机构信息

Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung A. Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 1996 Sep;29(5):302-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01389.x.

Abstract

The cutting efficiency for sizes 25 and 35 stainless steel Hedstrom S and U files from 10 manufacturers, and titanium-alloy Hedstrom S and U files from five manufacturers, tested for linear (filing) motion under standardized conditions were determined. Special plastic samples having well-defined abrasive properties were used as the substrate and constant pressure was applied until the instruments were blunt. The depth of the groove achieved by filing was used to measure cutting efficiency. For both sizes there were significant differences in the cutting efficiency of files made by the various manufacturers (P < 0.001). Hedstrom files made of stainless steel, made by VDW, gave the best cutting efficiency for sizes 25 and 35. Overall, under the conditions of this study. Hedstrom files had better cutting efficiency than S or U files. Likewise, stainless steel files provided better cutting efficiency than instruments made of titanium alloys.

摘要

测定了10家制造商生产的25号和35号不锈钢Hedstrom S锉和U锉,以及5家制造商生产的钛合金Hedstrom S锉和U锉在标准化条件下进行直线(锉削)运动时的切割效率。使用具有明确磨料特性的特殊塑料样品作为基底,并施加恒定压力,直到器械变钝。通过锉削形成的凹槽深度用于测量切割效率。对于这两种尺寸,不同制造商生产的锉的切割效率存在显著差异(P<0.001)。VDW生产的不锈钢Hedstrom锉在25号和35号尺寸上具有最佳切割效率。总体而言,在本研究条件下,Hedstrom锉比S锉或U锉具有更好的切割效率。同样,不锈钢锉比钛合金制成的器械具有更好的切割效率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验