Camps J J, Pertot W J
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Unité IMEB, Marseille, France.
Int Endod J. 1995 Nov;28(6):279-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00316.x.
The purpose of this study was to compare, in vitro, the machining efficiency of four brands of nickel-titanium files and two brands of stainless steel K-type files. Instruments sizes 15 to 40 were tested in a linear motion simulating the clinical motion used to remove a file from the canal. The tips of the loaded files were in contact with a resin block. The load applied increased with file size. An indentation varnish caliper was used to measure the depth of the groove after 100 back-and-forward motions. The stainless steel instruments with a triangular cross-section were more efficient than the stainless steel instruments with a square cross-section. There was a significant discrepancy between the machining ability of the nickel-titanium K files. The Maillefer instruments were the most efficient.
本研究的目的是在体外比较四个品牌的镍钛锉和两个品牌的不锈钢K型锉的切削效率。对尺寸为15至40的器械进行测试,采用模拟从根管中取出锉的临床动作的直线运动。加载后的锉尖与树脂块接触。施加的载荷随锉的尺寸增加而增加。使用压痕清漆卡尺测量100次前后运动后凹槽的深度。三角形横截面的不锈钢器械比方形横截面的不锈钢器械更高效。镍钛K锉的切削能力之间存在显著差异。Maillefer器械效率最高。