Freedman M H
Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Ontario, Canada.
Curr Opin Hematol. 1997 May;4(3):217-24. doi: 10.1097/00062752-199704030-00011.
When a new product with huge clinical potential explodes on the scene, the hope is that the benefits far outweigh the risks in long-term administration. After 10 years of clinical use, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has lived up to that promise so far. In the context of severe chronic neutropenia, more than 90% of patients have reaped big benefits in terms of improved quality of life and less infection, inflammation, antibiotic use, and hospitalization as well as oropharyngeal ulcers. With long-term use, toxic and adverse events have been catalogued but in general are not clinically troublesome and, aside from occasional adjustment of scheduling and dosing, seldom necessitate stopping therapy. Currently, the topic of intense focus is the phenomenon of malignant myeloid transformation in patients with congenital neutropenia who are receiving G-CSF. Data from the Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry have identified 23 of 249 patients with congenital neutropenia who have developed myelodysplasia or acute myelogenous leukemia (MDS/AML) giving a crude rate of about 9% with an average follow-up of 4.5 years. No cases of MDS/AML have occurred in 257 patients with cyclic or idiopathic neutropenia. A critical analysis of the incidence of transformation year by year showed a fairly uniform hazard rate of less than 2% per year, and the risk of MDS/AML after 5 to 6 years of therapy did not appear to be greater than during the first year of therapy. The transformation risk in the congenital cohort must also be viewed in the context of published reports of spontaneous myelodysplasia or acute myelogenous leukemia occurring in these patients in the pre-G-CSF era. Thus, the role of G-CSF in malignant conversion is still not clear and requires long-term vigilance and research. G-CSF is still deemed specific therapy for severe chronic neutropenia with a high margin of safety and should be the initial treatment for this family of disorders.
当一款具有巨大临床潜力的新产品突然出现时,人们希望其长期使用的益处远大于风险。经过10年的临床应用,粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)到目前为止不负所望。在严重慢性中性粒细胞减少症的情况下,超过90%的患者在生活质量改善、感染减少、炎症减轻、抗生素使用减少、住院次数减少以及口咽溃疡方面都获得了巨大益处。长期使用时,已记录了毒性和不良事件,但总体而言在临床上并不麻烦,除了偶尔调整给药时间和剂量外,很少需要停止治疗。目前,备受关注的话题是接受G-CSF治疗的先天性中性粒细胞减少症患者发生恶性髓系转化的现象。严重慢性中性粒细胞减少症国际登记处的数据显示,249例先天性中性粒细胞减少症患者中有23例发生了骨髓发育异常或急性髓系白血病(MDS/AML),粗略发生率约为9%,平均随访4.5年。257例周期性或特发性中性粒细胞减少症患者未发生MDS/AML病例。逐年对转化发生率进行的批判性分析显示,每年的风险率相当一致,低于2%,且治疗5至6年后发生MDS/AML的风险似乎并不高于治疗第一年。先天性队列中的转化风险还必须结合G-CSF时代之前这些患者中发生自发性骨髓发育异常或急性髓系白血病的已发表报告来考量。因此,G-CSF在恶性转化中的作用仍不明确,需要长期警惕和研究。G-CSF仍被认为是治疗严重慢性中性粒细胞减少症的特效疗法,安全性高,应作为这类疾病的初始治疗方法。