Anyukhovsky E P, Guo S D, Danilo P, Rosen M R
Department of Pharmacology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997 Jun;8(6):658-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb01829.x.
Previously we found that WB4101 (WB) 10(-7) M competitively blocks three alpha 1-adrenergic receptor-effector responses: the increase in normal automaticity occurring in Purkinje fibers (PF) at high membrane potentials; the increase in abnormal automaticity occurring in PF at depolarized membrane potentials; and the prolongation of PF action potential duration. These observations are consistent with two different hypotheses: (1) WB blocks a single alpha 1-receptor subtype, which subserves different effector pathways; and (2) WB blocks different receptor subtypes, each of which subserves an independent pathway. The aim of this study was to test both hypotheses.
We used standard microelectrode techniques to study the concentration-dependent actions of three alpha 1-adrenoreceptor blockers (WB [alpha 1A > or = alpha 1D], 5-methylurapidil [5-MU] [alpha 1A > > alpha 1D], and UK52,046 [nonselective]) or norepinephrine (NE) effects in normal PF and in PF depolarized with a simulated ischemic solution ([K+]o = 10 mM; pO2 < 20 mmHg; pH 6.8; maximum diastolic potential -60 +/- 1 mV). In normally polarized PF, concentration-dependent actions of all blockers on both the positive chronotropic response and the prolongation of action potential duration completely coincide. In contrast, the response to NE of abnormal automaticity in "ischemic" PF differs from normals: there is a high sensitivity to WB and 5-MU and no response to UK52,046.
(1) A single receptor subtype appears responsible for both the alpha 1-induced prolongation of repolarization and the positive chronotropic effect in normal PF. (2) Two different receptor subtypes may be responsible for the alpha 1-induced effects on automaticity in normal and ischemic fibers. It is likely that the latter one is alpha 1A, and that consideration of antiarrhythmic therapy with alpha 1-adrenergic blockers should focus on this subtype as a potential target.
此前我们发现,10⁻⁷ M的WB4101(WB)可竞争性阻断三种α1-肾上腺素能受体效应反应:在高膜电位下浦肯野纤维(PF)中正常自律性的增加;在去极化膜电位下PF中异常自律性的增加;以及PF动作电位持续时间的延长。这些观察结果与两种不同的假设一致:(1)WB阻断单一的α1-受体亚型,该亚型作用于不同的效应器途径;(2)WB阻断不同的受体亚型,每个亚型作用于独立的途径。本研究的目的是检验这两种假设。
我们使用标准微电极技术研究了三种α1-肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂(WB [α1A≥α1D]、5-甲基尿嘧啶 [5-MU] [α1A>>α1D] 和UK52,046 [非选择性])或去甲肾上腺素(NE)在正常PF和用模拟缺血溶液([K⁺]o = 10 mM;pO2 < 20 mmHg;pH 6.8;最大舒张电位 -60±1 mV)去极化的PF中的浓度依赖性作用。在正常极化的PF中,所有阻滞剂对正性变时反应和动作电位持续时间延长的浓度依赖性作用完全一致。相反,“缺血”PF中异常自律性对NE的反应与正常情况不同:对WB和5-MU高度敏感,对UK52,046无反应。
(1)单一受体亚型似乎负责正常PF中α1诱导的复极延长和正性变时效应。(2)两种不同的受体亚型可能负责α1对正常和缺血纤维自律性的诱导作用。后者可能是α1A,并且考虑用α1-肾上腺素能阻滞剂进行抗心律失常治疗时应将该亚型作为潜在靶点。