Fraser J J
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston 77030, USA.
Tex Med. 1997 Jan;93(1):76-80.
The medical malpractice crises and ensuing tort reform efforts, including methods of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), are generally reviewed. Arbitration in the context of medical malpractice is examined from the perspective of other states' experiences. Michigan has one of the nation's oldest medical malpractice arbitration programs, but it suffers from underutilization. California's experience derives from the use of arbitration in the managed care setting. While Texas has statutory provisions for medical malpractice arbitration, in light of public policy favoring ADR, the statute could be perceived as antipublic policy, resulting in underuse. The National Practitioner Data Bank also serves to discourage physician participation. Policy options are offered to address these concerns.
本文对医疗事故危机及随后的侵权法改革举措进行了总体回顾,其中包括替代性纠纷解决(ADR)方法。从其他州的经验视角审视了医疗事故背景下的仲裁情况。密歇根州拥有美国历史最悠久的医疗事故仲裁项目之一,但该项目未得到充分利用。加利福尼亚州的经验源于在管理式医疗环境中采用仲裁。虽然得克萨斯州有医疗事故仲裁的法定条款,但鉴于支持ADR的公共政策,该法规可能被视为违背公共政策,导致使用不足。国家从业者数据库也不利于医生参与。文中提出了应对这些问题的政策选择。