Hanson J M, Liang Z P, Magin R L, Duerk J L, Lauterbur P C
Biomedical Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 61801, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 1997 Jul;38(1):161-7. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910380122.
Several constrained imaging methods have recently been proposed for dynamic imaging applications. This paper compares two of these methods: the Reduced-encoding Imaging by Generalized-series Reconstruction (RIGR) and Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) methods. RIGR utilizes a priori data for optimal image reconstruction whereas the SVD method seeks to optimize data acquisition. However, this study shows that the existing SVD encoding method tends to bias the data acquisition scheme toward reproducing the known features in the reference image. This characteristic of the SVD encoding method reduces its capability to capture new image features and makes it less suitable than RIGR for dynamic imaging applications.
最近,人们提出了几种用于动态成像应用的约束成像方法。本文比较了其中两种方法:广义级数重建的简化编码成像(RIGR)和奇异值分解(SVD)方法。RIGR利用先验数据进行最优图像重建,而SVD方法则致力于优化数据采集。然而,这项研究表明,现有的SVD编码方法往往会使数据采集方案偏向于重现参考图像中的已知特征。SVD编码方法的这一特性降低了其捕捉新图像特征的能力,使其比RIGR更不适合动态成像应用。