Freedman N J, Ament A S, Oppermann M, Stoffel R H, Exum S T, Lefkowitz R J
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3821, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
J Biol Chem. 1997 Jul 11;272(28):17734-43. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.28.17734.
Although endothelin-1 can elicit prolonged physiologic responses, accumulating evidence suggests that rapid desensitization affects the primary G protein-coupled receptors mediating these responses, the endothelin A and B receptors (ETA-R and ETB-R). The mechanisms by which this desensitization proceeds remain obscure, however. Because some intracellular domain sequences of the ETA-R and ETB-R differ substantially, we tested the possibility that these receptor subtypes might be differentially regulated by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). Homologous, or receptor-specific, desensitization occurred within 4 min both in the ETA-R-expressing A10 cells and in 293 cells transfected with either the human ETA-R or ETB-R. In 293 cells, this desensitization corresponded temporally with agonist-induced phosphorylation of each receptor, assessed by receptor immunoprecipitation from 32Pi-labeled cells. Agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation was not substantially affected by PKC inhibition but was reduced 40% (p << 0.03) by GRK inhibition, effected by a dominant negative GRK2 mutant. Inhibition of agonist-induced phosphorylation abrogated agonist-induced ETA-R desensitization. Overexpression of GRK2, -5, or -6 in 293 cells augmented agonist-induced ET-R phosphorylation approximately 2-fold (p << 0.02), but each kinase reduced receptor-promoted phosphoinositide hydrolysis differently. While GRK5 inhibited ET-R signaling by only approximately 25%, GRK2 inhibited ET-R signaling by 80% (p << 0.01). Congruent with its superior efficacy in suppressing ET-R signaling, GRK2, but not GRK5, co-immunoprecipitated with the ET-Rs in an agonist-dependent manner. We conclude that both the ETA-R and ETB-R can be regulated indistinguishably by GRK-initiated desensitization. We propose that because of its affinity for ET-Rs demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation, GRK2 is the most likely of the GRKs to initiate ET-R desensitization.
尽管内皮素-1可引发持久的生理反应,但越来越多的证据表明,快速脱敏会影响介导这些反应的主要G蛋白偶联受体,即内皮素A和B受体(ETA-R和ETB-R)。然而,这种脱敏过程的机制仍不清楚。由于ETA-R和ETB-R的一些细胞内结构域序列存在显著差异,我们测试了这些受体亚型可能受到G蛋白偶联受体激酶(GRK)差异调节的可能性。在表达ETA-R的A10细胞以及转染了人ETA-R或ETB-R的293细胞中,同源或受体特异性脱敏在4分钟内发生。在293细胞中,这种脱敏在时间上与激动剂诱导的每个受体的磷酸化相对应,通过从32Pi标记的细胞中进行受体免疫沉淀来评估。激动剂诱导的受体磷酸化基本上不受PKC抑制的影响,但通过显性负性GRK2突变体实现的GRK抑制使其降低了40%(p << 0.03)。激动剂诱导的磷酸化的抑制消除了激动剂诱导的ETA-R脱敏。在293细胞中过表达GRK2、-5或-6可使激动剂诱导的ET-R磷酸化增加约2倍(p << 0.02),但每种激酶对受体促进的磷酸肌醇水解的影响不同。虽然GRK5仅抑制ET-R信号传导约25%,但GRK2抑制ET-R信号传导达80%(p << 0.01)。与其在抑制ET-R信号传导方面的卓越功效一致,GRK2而非GRK5以激动剂依赖的方式与ET-R共免疫沉淀。我们得出结论,ETA-R和ETB-R均可通过GRK启动的脱敏进行无差异调节。我们提出,由于共免疫沉淀证明其对ET-R具有亲和力,GRK2是最有可能启动ET-R脱敏的GRK。