Suppr超能文献

[美国预先指示的一般实践]

[General practice of advance directives in the USA].

作者信息

Zülicke F

机构信息

Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington D.C., USA.

出版信息

Wien Med Wochenschr. 1997;147(6):139-44.

PMID:9214151
Abstract

Advance directives are written documents which tell what a person wants or does not want if he/she in the future cannot make his/her wishes known about medical treatment. There are three major forms of advance directives in the US: living will, durable power of attorney, and medical directive. Even though advance directives have been used for over 25 years, probably no more than 20% of Americans have prepared a written directive. What are the reasons for this relatively small percentage? It has been argued that they run the opposing risks of either being too general or too specific and that they often use a vague and confusing terminology. Furthermore, the two most frequently cited barriers were the patient's expectation that the physician should take the initiative and the sense that such issues were only relevant for those who were older or in worse health. Progress in developing useful advance directives cannot stop with existing documents. A critical evaluation of advance directives and the development of new ideas will be necessary. Therein, the most important area for future efforts is empirical research.

摘要

预先指示是书面文件,它说明了一个人在未来无法表达自己对医疗治疗的意愿时想要或不想要的东西。在美国,预先指示有三种主要形式:生前遗嘱、持久授权书和医疗指示。尽管预先指示已经使用了25年以上,但可能只有不到20%的美国人准备了书面指示。这个相对较小的比例是什么原因呢?有人认为,它们存在过于笼统或过于具体的相反风险,而且它们经常使用模糊和令人困惑的术语。此外,两个最常被提及的障碍是患者期望医生应主动采取行动,以及认为这些问题只与年龄较大或健康状况较差的人相关。制定有用的预先指示的进展不能止于现有文件。对预先指示进行批判性评估并提出新想法将是必要的。其中,未来努力的最重要领域是实证研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验