Suppr超能文献

用于筛选临床试验受试者是否感染复制型逆转录病毒的聚合酶链反应(PCR)和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测方法的评估。

Evaluation of PCR and ELISA assays for screening clinical trial subjects for replication-competent retrovirus.

作者信息

Martineau D, Klump W M, McCormack J E, DePolo N J, Kamantigue E, Petrowski M, Hanlon J, Jolly D J, Mento S J, Sajjadi N

机构信息

Chiron Technologies, Center for Gene Therapy, San Diego, CA 92121-1204, USA.

出版信息

Hum Gene Ther. 1997 Jul 1;8(10):1231-41. doi: 10.1089/hum.1997.8.10-1231.

Abstract

Gene delivery via murine-based recombinant retroviral vectors is currently widely used in gene therapy clinical trials. The vectors are engineered to be replication defective by replacing the structural and nonstructural genes of a cloned infectious retrovirus with a therapeutic gene of interest. The retroviral particles are currently generated in packaging cell lines, which supply all retroviral proteins in trans. Recombination between short homologous regions of the retroviral vector and packaging cell line elements can theoretically generate replication-competent retrovirus (RCR) and hence the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires the monitoring of clinical trial subjects for the presence of RCR. Sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays have been used for the detection of murine leukemia virus (MLV) nucleotide sequences in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). A novel serological enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of anti-MLV specific immunoglobulin (Ig) has been developed to be used as an alternative to the PCR assay. Both assays were used to monitor human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive clinical trial subjects who had received multiple injections of HIV-IT (V), a retroviral vector encoding HIV-1 IIIBenv/rev. Western blot analysis and an in vitro vector neutralization assay were used to characterize further a subset of serum samples tested by ELISA. Results show no evidence of RCR infection in clinical trial subjects. PCR and ELISA assays are discussed in terms of their advantages and limitations as routine screening assays for RCR. The PCR assay is our current choice for monitoring clinical trial subjects receiving direct administration of vector, and the ELISA is our choice for those receiving ex vivo treatment regimens.

摘要

通过基于小鼠的重组逆转录病毒载体进行基因递送目前在基因治疗临床试验中被广泛使用。这些载体通过用感兴趣的治疗基因替换克隆的感染性逆转录病毒的结构和非结构基因而被设计成复制缺陷型。逆转录病毒颗粒目前在包装细胞系中产生,这些细胞系以反式提供所有逆转录病毒蛋白。逆转录病毒载体和包装细胞系元件的短同源区域之间的重组理论上可以产生复制能力的逆转录病毒(RCR),因此美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)要求监测临床试验受试者是否存在RCR。灵敏的聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测已用于检测外周血单核细胞(PBMC)中的小鼠白血病病毒(MLV)核苷酸序列。一种用于检测抗MLV特异性免疫球蛋白(Ig)的新型血清学酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)已被开发出来,用作PCR检测的替代方法。这两种检测方法都用于监测接受多次注射HIV-IT(V)的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)阳性临床试验受试者,HIV-IT(V)是一种编码HIV-1 IIIB env/rev的逆转录病毒载体。采用蛋白质印迹分析和体外载体中和试验对ELISA检测的一部分血清样本进行进一步表征。结果显示在临床试验受试者中没有RCR感染的证据。讨论了PCR检测和ELISA检测作为RCR常规筛查检测方法的优缺点。PCR检测是我们目前监测接受载体直接给药的临床试验受试者的选择,而ELISA检测是我们对接受离体治疗方案的受试者的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验