Suppr超能文献

两种活化蛋白C抵抗方法作为因子V莱顿突变常规诊断检测的比较。

A comparison between two activated protein C resistance methods as routine diagnostic tests for factor V Leiden mutation.

作者信息

Aboud M R, Ma D D

机构信息

Department of Haematology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, N.S.W., Australia.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 1997 Jun;97(4):798-803. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.1432958.x.

Abstract

The most common commercially available test measuring activated protein C (APC) resistance relies on the the anticoagulant response to added APC in an activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) based method. Another method is a Russell Viper venom time (RVVT) based system. To improve the specificity for factor V Leiden of the APTT based method, pre-dilution of test plasma in FV-deficient plasma has recently been recommended. In this study we tested the relative suitabilities of the APTT-based system, the RVVT-based system and their corresponding assays modified by pre-dilution in FV-deficient plasma, for screening asymptomatic subjects, a group of thrombophilic patients (in particular those with low APC ratios), patients on oral anticoagulants, and patients with lupus anticoagulant (LAC). We found the RVVT-based assay to be superior to the APTT-based method in the separation of normals from those with FV Leiden mutation both in asymptomatic subjects and in the thrombophilic patient group. Both modified assays demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for FV Leiden, as verified by genotyping in asymptomatic subjects, thrombophilic patients and patients on oral anticoagulants, with the modified RVVT-based assay giving better separation between normals and FV Leiden. Inhibition of phospholipid-dependent coagulation by LAC antibodies rendered the APTT-based system less suitable than the phospholipid-rich RVVT-based one, and as nine of the 20 LAC-positive patients were on warfarin, we showed only the modified RVVT assay to be a reliable predictor of factor V Leiden in this patient group.

摘要

最常见的用于检测活化蛋白C(APC)抵抗的商业可用检测方法,是基于活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)的方法,依靠添加APC后的抗凝反应。另一种方法是基于罗素蝰蛇毒时间(RVVT)的系统。为提高基于APTT方法对因子V莱顿突变的特异性,最近有人建议在FV缺乏血浆中对检测血浆进行预稀释。在本研究中,我们测试了基于APTT的系统、基于RVVT的系统以及在FV缺乏血浆中进行预稀释改良后的相应检测方法,对于筛查无症状受试者、一组血栓形成倾向患者(特别是APC比率低的患者)、口服抗凝剂的患者以及狼疮抗凝物(LAC)患者的相对适用性。我们发现,在无症状受试者和血栓形成倾向患者组中,基于RVVT的检测方法在区分正常人与因子V莱顿突变者方面优于基于APTT的方法。两种改良检测方法对因子V莱顿突变的敏感性和特异性均为100%,这在无症状受试者、血栓形成倾向患者和口服抗凝剂的患者中通过基因分型得到验证,改良后的基于RVVT的检测方法在正常人与因子V莱顿突变者之间的区分效果更好。LAC抗体对磷脂依赖性凝血的抑制作用,使得基于APTT的系统不如富含磷脂的基于RVVT的系统适用,并且由于这20名LAC阳性患者中有9名正在服用华法林,我们发现只有改良后的RVVT检测方法是该患者组中因子V莱顿突变的可靠预测指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验