• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Physician-hastened death. Advisory guidelines for the San Francisco Bay area from the Bay Area Network of Ethics Committees.医生协助的死亡。旧金山湾区伦理委员会网络发布的旧金山湾区咨询指南。
West J Med. 1997 Jun;166(6):370-8.
2
Physician-hastened death and end-of-life care: development of a community-wide consensus statement and guidelines.医生加速死亡与临终关怀:制定全社区共识声明及指南。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1998 Spring;7(2):223-5. doi: 10.1017/s0963180198002199.
3
Nonbeneficial or futile medical treatment: conflict resolution guidelines for the San Francisco Bay area. Bay Area Network of Ethics Committees (BANEC) Nonbeneficial Treatment Working Group.无益或无效的医学治疗:旧金山湾区的冲突解决指南。湾区伦理委员会网络(BANEC)无益治疗工作组。
West J Med. 1999 May;170(5):287-90.
4
Physician aid-in-dying: toward a "harm reduction" approach.医生协助死亡:迈向“减少伤害”的方法。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1996 Winter;5(1):113-20.
5
Physician-hastened death: blessing or curse?医生加速死亡:是福还是祸?
West J Med. 1998 Nov;169(5):322-3.
6
Current events and bioethical concerns in physician-assisted death.医生协助死亡中的时事与生物伦理问题。
Mt Sinai J Med. 1998 Sep;65(4):257-64.
7
Euthanasia and assisted suicide in Dutch hospitals: the role of nurses.荷兰医院中的安乐死与协助自杀:护士的角色
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(12):1618-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02145.x.
8
Development and dissemination of institutional practice guidelines on medical end-of-life decisions in Dutch health care institutions.制定和传播荷兰医疗机构关于医疗临终决策的机构实践指南。
Health Policy. 2010 Mar;94(3):230-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.09.016. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
9
The Northern California Conference for Guidelines on Aid-in-Dying.北加利福尼亚临终关怀指南会议
West J Med. 1997 Jun;166(6):379-80.
10
Active euthanasia and assisted suicide: a perspective from an American abortion and Dutch euthanasia scenario.主动安乐死与协助自杀:来自美国堕胎与荷兰安乐死情形的视角
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998 Oct;25(9):1587-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician assisted death in vulnerable populations.弱势群体中的医生协助死亡。
BMJ. 2007 Sep 29;335(7621):625-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39336.629271.BE.
2
Physician-hastened death: blessing or curse?医生加速死亡:是福还是祸?
West J Med. 1998 Nov;169(5):322-3.

本文引用的文献

1
A communitarian approach to physician-assisted death.一种社群主义视角下的医生协助死亡。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1997 Winter;6(1):78-87.
2
Physician aid-in-dying: toward a "harm reduction" approach.医生协助死亡:迈向“减少伤害”的方法。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1996 Winter;5(1):113-20.
3
The legalization of physician-assisted suicide.
N Engl J Med. 1996 Aug 29;335(9):663-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199608293350912.
4
Legalizing assisted suicide--views of physicians in Oregon.俄勒冈州医生对协助自杀合法化的看法
N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 1;334(5):310-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602013340507.
5
Attitudes toward assisted suicide and euthanasia among physicians in Washington State.华盛顿州医生对协助自杀和安乐死的态度。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):89-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199407143310206.
6
Harm reduction--a framework for incorporating science into drug policy.减少危害——将科学纳入毒品政策的框架。
Am J Public Health. 1995 Jan;85(1):10-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.1.10.
7
Medicine's position is both pivotal and precarious in assisted-suicide debate.在协助自杀的辩论中,医学的立场既关键又不稳定。
JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):363-4.
8
Regulating physician-assisted death.规范医生协助下的死亡。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):119-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199407143310211.
9
Euthanasia--the need for procedural safeguards.安乐死——程序保障措施的必要性。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jan 16;326(3):197-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199201163260311.
10
Should physicians aid their patients in dying? The public perspective.医生应该协助病人死亡吗?公众的观点。
JAMA. 1992 May 20;267(19):2658-62.

医生协助的死亡。旧金山湾区伦理委员会网络发布的旧金山湾区咨询指南。

Physician-hastened death. Advisory guidelines for the San Francisco Bay area from the Bay Area Network of Ethics Committees.

作者信息

Heilig S, Brody R, Marcus F S, Shavelson L, Sussman P C

机构信息

San Francisco Medical Society, CA 94108, USA.

出版信息

West J Med. 1997 Jun;166(6):370-8.

PMID:9217447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1304310/
Abstract

Recent high court opinions and pending Supreme Court rulings on the legality of physician-hastened death necessitate a pragmatic response from the medical profession. Adopting a "harm reduction" perspective on this contentious topic, the Bay Area Network of Ethics Committees developed practice guidelines for responding to a patient request for hastened death. The guidelines will be offered to the local medical community for use by individuals and health care institutions if the practice of physician-hastened death becomes legal. A multidisciplinary consensus process was used in developing the guidelines, which address clinical, ethical, and procedural concerns.

摘要

近期高等法院关于医生协助死亡合法性的意见以及最高法院悬而未决的裁决,使得医学界必须做出务实的回应。在这个有争议的话题上,湾区伦理委员会网络从“减少伤害”的角度出发,制定了应对患者加速死亡请求的实践指南。如果医生协助死亡的做法合法化,这些指南将提供给当地医疗界供个人和医疗机构使用。制定这些指南采用了多学科共识程序,涉及临床、伦理和程序方面的问题。