Vik T, Vatten L, Markestad T, Jacobsen G, Bakketeig L S
Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Am J Perinatol. 1997 Jul;14(6):369-73. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994163.
We compared assessment of gestational age by Dubowitz score with ultrasonic measurement of the biparietal diameter (BPD), and then evaluated how infants were classified by these methods as small-for-gestational age (SGA), and as pre- or post-term births. BPD gestational age was assessed at week 17 to 20 of pregnancy while the Dubowitz scoring was done at birth. "Limits of agreement" between methods and kappa values were calculated and used to evaluate agreement. Among 839 included infants, there was moderate agreement between Dubowitz score and BPD (limits of agreement; -2.3; +2.1 weeks; weighted kappa: 0.46) in the assessment of gestational age. Agreement between Dubowitz score and BPD in the classification of SGA (kappa: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.81) and preterm infants (kappa: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.56-0.80) was good, whereas agreement on infants born post-term was no better than chance (kappa: 0.14, 95% CI: -0.02(-)+0.30). We conclude that despite moderate agreement between Dubowitz score and BPD in the assessment of gestational age, agreement in the classification of low-birth-weight infants as SGA and as premature births was good.
我们将通过杜波维茨评分评估胎龄与双顶径(BPD)超声测量结果进行了比较,然后评估了通过这些方法如何将婴儿分类为小于胎龄儿(SGA)以及早产或过期产。在妊娠第17至20周评估BPD胎龄,而杜波维茨评分在出生时进行。计算了两种方法之间的“一致性界限”和kappa值,并用于评估一致性。在纳入的839名婴儿中,杜波维茨评分与BPD在胎龄评估方面存在中度一致性(一致性界限:-2.3;+2.1周;加权kappa:0.46)。杜波维茨评分与BPD在SGA分类(kappa:0.75,95%置信区间[CI]:0.69 - 0.81)和早产儿分类(kappa:0.68,95%CI:0.56 - 0.80)方面的一致性良好,而在过期产儿分类上的一致性不比随机情况更好(kappa:0.14,95%CI:-0.02(-)+0.30)。我们得出结论,尽管杜波维茨评分与BPD在胎龄评估方面存在中度一致性,但在将低体重儿分类为SGA和早产方面的一致性良好。