Emonds M P, Claeys H, Volckaerts A, Dendievel J, Vermylen C
Blood Bank Rode Kruis Vlaanderen, Leuven, Belgium.
Clin Lab Haematol. 1997 Jun;19(2):129-36. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2257.1997.00218.x.
An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method based on solubilized human leucocyte antigens (HLA) derived from single donor platelets is described. The EIA results on these solubilized single donor HLA antigens (SDszHLA) correlated well with the complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) results on the lymphocytes of the same donors and also with the panel reactivity (PRA) in CDC. A concordancy rate of 78% was found for individual HLA specificities. The EIA+/CDC- ('false positive') discrepancies were more pronounced than EIA-/CDC+ ('false negative') discrepancies and varied for the different donors. To confirm discrepancies, our method was compared with a commercial PRA-STAT EIA method (based on secreted soluble HLA antigens). The same discrepancies between CDC and PRA-STAT EIA were found and are probably due to the higher and different sensitivity (e.g. non complement fixing antibodies) of EIA methods. A SDszHLA EIA method allows the identification of HLA specificities of HLA-antisera. The possibility of using individual and selected donors for the production of SDszHLA allows the directed search for well defined HLA specificities in order to confirm anti-HLA specificities found in other anti-HLA screening methods. An individualized HLA panel can be established with the support of blood banks that have HLA typed blood and platelet donors.
描述了一种基于从单供体血小板中提取的可溶性人类白细胞抗原(HLA)的酶免疫测定(EIA)方法。对这些可溶性单供体HLA抗原(SDszHLA)的EIA结果与同一供体淋巴细胞的补体依赖细胞毒性(CDC)结果以及CDC中的群体反应性(PRA)密切相关。发现个体HLA特异性的一致性率为78%。EIA+/CDC-(“假阳性”)差异比EIA-/CDC+(“假阴性”)差异更明显,且因不同供体而异。为了确认差异,将我们的方法与一种商业PRA-STAT EIA方法(基于分泌的可溶性HLA抗原)进行了比较。发现CDC和PRA-STAT EIA之间存在相同的差异,这可能是由于EIA方法具有更高且不同的敏感性(例如非补体结合抗体)。SDszHLA EIA方法可用于鉴定HLA抗血清的HLA特异性。使用个体和选定供体生产SDszHLA的可能性使得能够有针对性地寻找明确的HLA特异性,以确认在其他抗HLA筛选方法中发现的抗HLA特异性。在拥有HLA分型血液和血小板供体的血库支持下,可以建立个体化的HLA分型板。