Suppr超能文献

器官移植倡议:处于模糊地带。

Organ transplant initiatives: the twilight zone.

作者信息

Price D P

机构信息

School of Law, De Montfort University, Leicester.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1997 Jun;23(3):170-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.3.170.

Abstract

Assessments of the acceptability of new transplantation practices require a pinpointing of not only the meaning of death, but also the timing of death. They typically perceive elective ventilation as occurring just prior to death and non-heart-beating donor protocols as operative just after death. However, such practices in fact highlight the general vagueness and ambiguity surrounding these issues in both law and ethics. Supply-side dilemmas in transplantation lend real urgency to this "life or death" debate.

摘要

对新移植实践可接受性的评估不仅需要明确死亡的定义,还需要确定死亡的时间。他们通常认为选择性通气发生在死亡前,而非心跳供体方案在死亡后实施。然而,这些实践实际上凸显了法律和伦理中围绕这些问题的普遍模糊性和不确定性。移植中的供应方困境使这场“生死”辩论具有了真正的紧迫性。

相似文献

1
Organ transplant initiatives: the twilight zone.器官移植倡议:处于模糊地带。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Jun;23(3):170-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.3.170.
6
Life, death, and solid organ transplantation without brain death.
Crit Care Med. 1993 Sep;21(9 Suppl):S356-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199309001-00033.
7
Organ transplantation without brain death.无脑死亡情况下的器官移植。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000 Sep;913:229-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05175.x.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验