Cragg S J, Greenfield S A
University Department of Pharmacology, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3QT, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 1997 Aug 1;17(15):5738-46. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-15-05738.1997.
Dopamine (DA) is released from somatodendritic sites of neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA), where it has neuromodulatory effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of D2 autoreceptor inhibition in the regulation of this somatodendritic release in each region. Fast cyclic voltammetry at carbon fiber microelectrodes was used to measure electrically evoked DA release in vitro. Furthermore, we compared D2 regulation of somatodendritic release with the more familiar axon terminal release in caudate putamen (CPu) and nucleus accumbens (NAc). Evoked DA release was TTX-sensitive at all sites. There was significant D2 autoinhibition of DA release in SNc; however, this mechanism was two- to threefold less powerful, as compared with axon terminal release in CPu. In contrast to SNc, somatodendritic release in VTA was not under significant D2 receptor control, whereas release in the respective axon terminal region (NAc) was controlled strongly by autoinhibition. Thus, these data indicate that, first, autoinhibition via D2 receptors consistently plays a less significant role in the control of somatodendritic than axon terminal DA release, and, second, even at the level of somatodendrites themselves, D2 autoinhibition displays marked regional variation. In the light of previous data indicating that DA uptake processes are also less active in somatodendritic than in terminal regions, these results are interpreted as indicating that DA transmission is regulated differently in somatodendritic zones, as compared with axon terminals, and thus may have different functional consequences.
多巴胺(DA)从黑质致密部(SNc)和腹侧被盖区(VTA)神经元的胞体树突部位释放,在这些部位它具有神经调节作用。本研究的目的是评估D2自身受体抑制在调节每个区域这种胞体树突释放中的作用。使用碳纤维微电极上的快速循环伏安法在体外测量电诱发的DA释放。此外,我们比较了胞体树突释放的D2调节与尾壳核(CPu)和伏隔核(NAc)中更为人熟知的轴突终末释放。在所有部位,诱发的DA释放对河豚毒素(TTX)敏感。SNc中存在显著的D2对DA释放的自身抑制作用;然而,与CPu中的轴突终末释放相比,这种机制的作用强度要低两到三倍。与SNc相反,VTA中的胞体树突释放不受D2受体的显著控制,而在相应的轴突终末区域(NAc)的释放则受到强烈的自身抑制控制。因此,这些数据表明,首先,通过D2受体的自身抑制在控制胞体树突DA释放方面始终比轴突终末释放发挥的作用小,其次,即使在胞体树突自身水平,D2自身抑制也表现出明显的区域差异。鉴于先前的数据表明DA摄取过程在胞体树突中也比在终末区域活性更低,这些结果被解释为表明与轴突终末相比,DA在胞体树突区域的传递受到不同的调节,因此可能具有不同的功能后果。