Yao L, Peck C K
School of Optometry, University of Missouri-St. Louis, 63121, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 1997 Jun;115(1):25-34. doi: 10.1007/pl00005682.
Recent neurophysiological studies of the saccadic ocular motor system have lent support to the hypothesis that this system uses a motor error signal in retinotopic coordinates to direct saccades to both visual and auditory targets. With visual targets, the coordinates of the sensory and motor error signals will be identical unless the eyes move between the time of target presentation and the time of saccade onset. However, targets from other modalities must undergo different sensory-motor transformations to access the same motor error map. Because auditory targets are initially localized in head-centered coordinates, analyzing the metrics of saccades from different starting positions allows a determination of whether the coordinates of the motor signals are those of the sensory system. We studied six human subjects who made saccades to visual or auditory targets from a central fixation point or from one at 10 degrees to the right or left of the midline of the head. Although the latencies of saccades to visual targets increased as stimulus eccentricity increased, the latencies of saccades to auditory targets decreased as stimulus eccentricity increased. The longest auditory latencies were for the smallest values of motor error (the difference between target position and fixation eye position) or desired saccade size, regardless of the position of the auditory target relative to the head or the amplitude of the executed saccade. Similarly, differences in initial eye position did not affect the accuracy of saccades of the same desired size. When saccadic error was plotted as a function of motor error, the curves obtained at the different fixation positions overlapped completely. Thus, saccadic programs in the central nervous system compensated for eye position regardless of the modality of the saccade target, supporting the hypothesis that the saccadic ocular motor system uses motor error signals to direct saccades to auditory targets.
近期对眼球扫视运动系统的神经生理学研究支持了这样一种假说,即该系统使用视网膜坐标中的运动误差信号将扫视导向视觉和听觉目标。对于视觉目标,除非眼睛在目标呈现时间和扫视开始时间之间移动,否则感觉误差信号和运动误差信号的坐标将是相同的。然而,来自其他模态的目标必须经过不同的感觉 - 运动转换才能访问相同的运动误差图谱。由于听觉目标最初是在以头部为中心的坐标中定位的,分析来自不同起始位置的扫视指标可以确定运动信号的坐标是否与感觉系统的坐标相同。我们研究了六名人类受试者,他们从中央注视点或头部中线右侧或左侧10度处的注视点向视觉或听觉目标进行扫视。尽管随着刺激偏心度增加,向视觉目标的扫视潜伏期增加,但向听觉目标的扫视潜伏期随着刺激偏心度增加而减少。无论听觉目标相对于头部的位置或执行扫视的幅度如何,最长的听觉潜伏期都对应于最小的运动误差值(目标位置与注视眼位置之间的差异)或期望的扫视大小。同样,初始眼位的差异并不影响相同期望大小扫视的准确性。当将扫视误差绘制为运动误差的函数时,在不同注视位置获得的曲线完全重叠。因此,中枢神经系统中的扫视程序会补偿眼位,无论扫视目标的模态如何,这支持了眼球扫视运动系统使用运动误差信号将扫视导向听觉目标的假说。