James W P, Avenell A, Broom J, Whitehead J
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997 Jun;21 Suppl 3:S24-30.
This paper describes the methodology of a multicentre study designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of orlistat 120 mg tid as therapy for inducing weight loss in excess of that achieved with a moderately calorie-restricted diet alone. The results from a single centre are presented to illustrate the nature of the response.
This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled multicentre study. A four-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period preceded a 52 week double-blind treatment period during which patients received either orlistat or placebo three times a day. At the start of the run-in period, all patients were placed on a diet containing approximately 30% of calories as fat and designed to cause an energy deficit of approximately 600 kcal/d.
Patients of either sex, more than 18 y of age, with a body mass index (BMI) between 30 and 43 kg/m2 were eligible for enrolment.
Efficacy assessments included: measurements of body weight; anthropometry; quality of life; blood pressure; serum lipids; fasting serum glucose and insulin. Safety assessments included: adverse events; vital signs; ECG; renal and gallbladder ultrasound; haematology; serum biochemistry.
In the single centre there was a reduction in body weight of 5.5 +/- 4.5 (s.d.) kg (5.7% reduction) in the placebo group and 8.6 +/- 5.4kg in the orlistat-treated group (8.4% reduction) by six months. Thereafter, the placebo group tended to relapse whereas the orlistat group maintained their loss (2.6% vs 8.4% reduction from initial value at 52 weeks). Total and LDL cholesterol fell by 0.05 mmol/l (1.6%) and 0.14 mmol/l (4.2%), respectively, in orlistat treated patients. The drop-out rate was 48% in the placebo group and 39% in the orlistat group. Intestinal symptoms related to orlistat were significantly increased compared to placebo but were well tolerated. Fat soluble vitamin levels remained within the normal range in the treatment group; the reduction seen in alpha-tocopherol levels in patients receiving orlistat was normalized by the decrease in plasma cholesterol concentrations. Beta-carotene and vitamin D concentrations also decreased in orlistat-treated patients.
This preliminary analysis suggests that orlistat, when used with a health-promoting low-fat and moderately energy-restricted diet, confers advantages in the long-term management of obesity.
本文描述了一项多中心研究的方法,该研究旨在评估每日三次服用120毫克奥利司他作为一种治疗方法诱导体重减轻的疗效和耐受性,其减重效果超过仅采用适度限制热量饮食所实现的减重效果。展示了来自单个中心的结果以说明反应的性质。
这是一项双盲、随机、平行组、安慰剂对照的多中心研究。在为期52周的双盲治疗期之前有一个为期四周的单盲、安慰剂导入期,在此期间患者每日三次接受奥利司他或安慰剂治疗。在导入期开始时,所有患者采用一种脂肪热量约占30%且旨在造成每日约600千卡能量 deficit的饮食。
年龄超过18岁、体重指数(BMI)在30至43千克/平方米之间的男女患者均符合入组条件。
疗效评估包括:体重测量;人体测量学;生活质量;血压;血脂;空腹血糖和胰岛素。安全性评估包括:不良事件;生命体征;心电图;肾脏和胆囊超声检查;血液学;血清生物化学。
在单个中心,到六个月时,安慰剂组体重减轻5.5±4.5(标准差)千克(减轻5.7%),奥利司他治疗组体重减轻8.6±5.4千克(减轻8.4%)。此后,安慰剂组有体重反弹趋势,而奥利司他组维持了体重减轻效果(52周时与初始值相比,安慰剂组减轻2.6%,奥利司他组减轻8.4%)。在接受奥利司他治疗的患者中,总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇分别下降了0.05毫摩尔/升(1.6%)和0.14毫摩尔/升(4.2%)。安慰剂组的脱落率为48%,奥利司他组为39%。与安慰剂相比,与奥利司他相关的肠道症状显著增加,但耐受性良好。治疗组中脂溶性维生素水平保持在正常范围内;接受奥利司他治疗的患者中α-生育酚水平的下降因血浆胆固醇浓度的降低而恢复正常。在接受奥利司他治疗的患者中,β-胡萝卜素和维生素D浓度也有所下降。
这项初步分析表明,当与促进健康的低脂和适度能量限制饮食一起使用时,奥利司他在肥胖症的长期管理中具有优势。