Suppr超能文献

难治性或复发性淋巴瘤中的干细胞动员:与中等剂量环磷酰胺相比,包含异环磷酰胺、依托泊苷和表柔比星的挽救方案后祖细胞产量更高。

Stem cell mobilization in resistant or relapsed lymphoma: superior yield of progenitor cells following a salvage regimen comprising ifosphamide, etoposide and epirubicin compared to intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide.

作者信息

McQuaker I G, Haynes A P, Stainer C, Anderson S, Russell N H

机构信息

Department of Haematology, Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 1997 Jul;98(1):228-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.1812998.x.

Abstract

We analysed the factors influencing the efficacy of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in patients with lymphoma. Sixty-six patients underwent initial PBSC collection following mobilization with chemotherapy plus recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (300 microg/d). Patients were mobilized with one of two chemotherapy regimens, either cyclophophamide (3 g/m2 or 4 g/m2) (n = 50) or ifosphamide, etoposide and epirubicin (IVE; n = 16). The target of collecting > 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was achieved in 43/66 (65%) patients with a median of two apheresis procedures. The IVE plus G-CSF mobilization regimen gave a significantly higher median yield of CD34+ cells (8.62 x 10(6)/kg) compared with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF (3.59 x 10(6)/kg) (P = 0.045). The median yield of CD34+ cells per leukapheresis was almost twice as high in patients receiving IVE (1.94 x 10(6)/kg) compared to cyclophosphamide (1.03 x 10(6)/kg) (P = 0.035). In a univariate analysis of the factors affecting mobilization, the subtype of lymphoma (high-grade NHL) and the mobilization regimen were the only factors associated with high CD34+ cell yield. However, in a multivariate analysis of factors affecting mobilization including age, lymphoma subtype, previous chemotherapy and radiotherapy, only the use of the IVE protocol was predictive of a high yield of CD34+ cells. In 13 patients undergoing a second mobilization procedure the use of IVE was associated with a significantly higher yield of CD34+ cells compared to cyclophosphamide; three patients who failed cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF mobilization were able to proceed to transplantation following successful mobilization with IVE + G-CSF. These results demonstrate that IVE is a highly effective mobilization regimen which is superior to cyclophophamide and has the benefit of being effective salvage therapy for lymphoma patients.

摘要

我们分析了影响淋巴瘤患者外周血干细胞(PBSC)采集效果的因素。66例患者在接受化疗加重组粒细胞集落刺激因子(300μg/d)动员后进行了首次PBSC采集。患者采用两种化疗方案之一进行动员,即环磷酰胺(3g/m²或4g/m²)(n = 50)或异环磷酰胺、依托泊苷和表柔比星(IVE;n = 16)。43/66(65%)的患者通过中位数为两次的单采程序达到了采集>2.0×10⁶个CD³⁴⁺细胞/kg的目标。与环磷酰胺加G-CSF(3.59×10⁶/kg)相比,IVE加G-CSF动员方案的CD³⁴⁺细胞中位数产量显著更高(8.62×10⁶/kg)(P = 0.045)。接受IVE的患者每次白细胞单采的CD³⁴⁺细胞中位数产量几乎是环磷酰胺患者的两倍(1.94×10⁶/kg对1.03×10⁶/kg)(P = 0.035)。在对影响动员的因素进行单变量分析时,淋巴瘤亚型(高级别NHL)和动员方案是与高CD³⁴⁺细胞产量相关的唯一因素。然而,在对包括年龄、淋巴瘤亚型、既往化疗和放疗在内的影响动员的因素进行多变量分析时,只有IVE方案的使用可预测CD³⁴⁺细胞的高产率。在13例接受第二次动员程序的患者中,与环磷酰胺相比,IVE的使用与显著更高的CD³⁴⁺细胞产量相关;3例环磷酰胺加G-CSF动员失败的患者在IVE + G-CSF动员成功后能够进行移植。这些结果表明,IVE是一种高效的动员方案,优于环磷酰胺,并且对淋巴瘤患者具有有效的挽救治疗作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验