Ware C F
Doc Ophthalmol. 1977 Sep 30;44(1):173-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00171469.
Two cases of intermittent unilateral motor disturbance of the superior oblique muslce are presented and compared with cases reported previously by Duane, Clark and Hoyt & Keane and briefly mentioned by Duke-Elder in his System of Ophthalmology. The first case is a girl with longstanding history of oscillopsia, vertical and tortional oscillatory diplopia. No abnormal eye movements were observed but objective evidence of the disturbance was obtained in the form of electromyography during which relationship of the superior oblique was established. In contrast, the second case experienced episodes of static vertical and tortional diplopia similar to the case reported to by Clark. Again the relationship in the condition was unilateral involving the superior oblique muscle. There was no corroboratory evidence to support the diagnosis of an intermittent superior oblique tendon sheath syndrome. Hoyt & Keane's theory based on their electromyography findings that the lesion is in the lower motor neuron unit is reported and the significance of the oscillopsia as corroboratory evidence is discussed.
本文报告了两例上斜肌间歇性单侧运动障碍的病例,并与Duane、Clark以及Hoyt和Keane之前报道的病例进行了比较,Duke-Elder在其《眼科学系统》中也简要提及过这些病例。第一例是一名女孩,有长期的视振荡、垂直和扭转性振荡复视病史。未观察到异常眼动,但通过肌电图获得了该障碍的客观证据,在此期间确定了上斜肌的关系。相比之下,第二例经历了类似于Clark报道病例的静态垂直和扭转性复视发作。同样,这种情况的关系是单侧的,累及上斜肌。没有确凿证据支持间歇性上斜肌腱鞘综合征的诊断。报告了Hoyt和Keane基于肌电图结果提出的病变位于下运动神经元单位的理论,并讨论了视振荡作为确凿证据的意义。