• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经锁骨下途径取出Teletronics 330-801心房导线。

Teletronics 330-801 atrial lead extraction via the subclavian approach.

作者信息

Telfer E A, Olshansky B, Cadman C, Prater S P, Lanzarotti C, Miles R H, Blakeman B P

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Loyola University of Chicago Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois 60153, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Jul;64(1):175-80. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00345-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00345-7
PMID:9236356
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Telectronics 330-801 atrial J (801) lead was recalled after reports implicated lead fracture/retention wire protrusion in patient mortality and morbidity. Recent reports suggest that 801 lead extraction may be associated with substantial morbidity and, possibly, excess mortality. We hypothesized that the 801 lead could be extracted using the subclavian approach with a high success rate and acceptable morbidity.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical outcomes in 60 consecutive patients who underwent 801 lead extraction.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (34 women) with a mean age of 67 +/- 14.8 years had 18 class I, 13 class II, and 29 class III fractures. The lead age was 39 +/- 17 months. The subclavian approach was successful in 58 of 60 patients (96%). Complications, three major and eight minor, occurred in 10 of 60 patients (16%). All complications were successfully treated. There were no deaths. Only concurrent ventricular lead extraction was associated with complications (p = 0.008 by Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSIONS

Telectronics 801 leads can be successfully extracted using the subclavian approach with acceptable short-term morbidity, low mortality, and excellent long-term results.

摘要

背景

在有报告指出患者的死亡率和发病率与电极导线断裂/固定导线突出有关后,Telectronics 330 - 801心房J(801)电极导线被召回。近期报告提示,801电极导线拔除可能与显著的发病率相关,甚至可能与额外的死亡率有关。我们推测采用锁骨下途径拔除801电极导线成功率高且发病率可接受。

方法

我们分析了连续60例接受801电极导线拔除患者的临床结局。

结果

60例患者(34例女性),平均年龄67±14.8岁,有18例I级、13例II级和29例III级导线断裂。电极导线使用时间为39±17个月。60例患者中有58例(96%)采用锁骨下途径拔除成功。60例患者中有10例(16%)发生并发症,其中3例为严重并发症,8例为轻微并发症。所有并发症均成功治疗。无死亡病例。仅同时拔除心室电极导线与并发症相关(Fisher精确检验p = 0.008)。

结论

采用锁骨下途径可成功拔除Telectronics 801电极导线,短期发病率可接受,死亡率低,长期效果良好。

相似文献

1
Teletronics 330-801 atrial lead extraction via the subclavian approach.经锁骨下途径取出Teletronics 330-801心房导线。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Jul;64(1):175-80. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00345-7.
2
Removal of the protruding retention wire via a femoral approach while leaving the active-fixation atrial "J" lead in situ: a technique for the management of class III atrial "J" leads.经股动脉途径移除突出的固定导线,同时将主动固定型心房“J”形导线留在原位:一种处理Ⅲ类心房“J”形导线的技术
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Oct;19(10):1508-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03166.x.
3
Extraction of the Telectronics Accufix 330-801 atrial lead: the Mayo Clinic experience.泰利特罗尼克斯Accufix 330 - 801心房导线的取出:梅奥诊所的经验
Mayo Clin Proc. 1996 Mar;71(3):230-4. doi: 10.4065/71.3.230.
4
Risks of spontaneous injury and extraction of an active fixation pacemaker lead: report of the Accufix Multicenter Clinical Study and Worldwide Registry.
Circulation. 1999 Dec 7;100(23):2344-52. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.23.2344.
5
Percutaneous extraction of a fractured, exposed atrial "J" lead retention wire.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996 Mar;37(3):342-6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199603)37:3<342::AID-CCD29>3.0.CO;2-I.
6
Laser-assisted extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads: the role of the cardiac surgeon.激光辅助拔除起搏器和除颤器导线:心脏外科医生的作用。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 May;87(5):1446-50; discussion 1450-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.015.
7
Early complications of permanent pacemaker implantation: no difference between dual and single chamber systems.永久性起搏器植入的早期并发症:双腔和单腔系统之间无差异。
Br Heart J. 1995 Jun;73(6):571-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.6.571.
8
Protrusion without fracture of the Accufix atrial "J" lead retention wire.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997 Sep;8(9):1062-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb00630.x.
9
Evaluation and extraction of the Accufix atrial J lead.Accufix心房J导联的评估与提取。
Am Heart J. 1996 Feb;131(2):266-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90352-x.
10
A comparison of lead placement through the subclavian vein technique with fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein technique for permanent pacemaker insertion.经锁骨下静脉技术与透视引导下腋静脉技术行永久性心脏起搏器植入的置管对比。
Can J Cardiol. 2012 Sep-Oct;28(5):542-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.02.019. Epub 2012 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical removal of an accufix pacing lead with a protruding J wire.
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Oct;50(10):443-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02913180.