Suppr超能文献

阿尔茨海默病临床试验新治疗疗效评估工具的多中心评价:概述与总体结果。阿尔茨海默病协作研究。

A multicenter evaluation of new treatment efficacy instruments for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: overview and general results. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study.

作者信息

Ferris S H, Mackell J A, Mohs R, Schneider L S, Galasko D, Whitehouse P J, Schmitt F A, Sano M, Thomas R G, Ernesto C, Grundman M, Schafer K, Thal L J

机构信息

NYU Medical Center, Aging and Dementia Research Center, New York 10016, USA.

出版信息

Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11 Suppl 2:S1-12.

PMID:9236947
Abstract

Evaluating treatment efficacy in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials requires optimal assessment methods to determine the extent and clinical meaningfulness of potential therapeutic effects of pharmacologic agents. Development of improved outcome measures for AD clinical trials is a major objective of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS), an NIA-sponsored, multisite clinical trials consortium. The ADCS Instrument Development Project evaluated the sensitivity, reliability and validity of new or improved measures in each of five assessment domains: (a) cognition (immediate and delayed memory, praxis, attention, and executive function); (b) clinical global change; (c) activities of daily living; (d) behavioral symptoms (agitation and other noncognitive symptoms); and (e) cognition in severely impaired patients. A total of 306 English-speaking subjects were enrolled in the study, including AD patients stratified by disease severity and cognitively normal, age-matched elderly subjects. Half were retested at 1 month and 2 months after baseline, and all received 6- and 12-month follow-up assessments. Spanish versions of these new measures are currently being evaluated. The development of this multisite study, the common methods and procedures, and a detailed description of the cohort are provided in this overview article. This multisite project demonstrates the feasibility of a consortium approach to instrument development. We were able to develop new instruments and efficiently evaluate their reliability and sensitivity to longitudinal change by capitalizing on the experience and patient resources of the participating ADCS research sites.

摘要

在阿尔茨海默病(AD)临床试验中评估治疗效果需要最佳的评估方法,以确定药物潜在治疗效果的程度和临床意义。开发用于AD临床试验的改进结局指标是由美国国立衰老研究所(NIA)资助的多中心临床试验联盟——阿尔茨海默病协作研究(ADCS)的主要目标。ADCS工具开发项目评估了五个评估领域中每项新的或改进指标的敏感性、可靠性和有效性:(a)认知(即时和延迟记忆、实践能力、注意力和执行功能);(b)临床整体变化;(c)日常生活活动;(d)行为症状(激越和其他非认知症状);以及(e)重度受损患者的认知。共有306名说英语的受试者参与了该研究,包括按疾病严重程度分层的AD患者以及认知正常、年龄匹配的老年受试者。其中一半在基线后1个月和2个月进行了重新测试,所有受试者均接受了为期6个月和12个月的随访评估。目前正在对这些新指标的西班牙语版本进行评估。这篇综述文章介绍了这项多中心研究的开展情况、通用方法和程序以及队列的详细描述。这个多中心项目证明了采用联盟方式开发工具的可行性。我们能够利用参与ADCS研究站点的经验和患者资源,开发新工具并有效评估其对纵向变化的可靠性和敏感性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验