Suppr超能文献

欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性研究(EPIC)中的饮食评估。

Dietary assessments in the European prospective study of diet and cancer (EPIC).

作者信息

Bingham S A

机构信息

Medical Research Council Dunn Clinical Nutrition Centre, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Prev. 1997 Apr;6(2):118-24.

PMID:9237058
Abstract

Biomarkers of nutrition intake were used to validate the dietary assessments proposed for use in the European prospective study of diet and cancer (EPIC). In the UK validation studies, the accuracy of several tested methods was assessed with weighed food records and biomarkers, 24 h urine nitrogen, potassium and plasma carotenoids and vitamin C. Correlations between dietary nitrogen intake from weighed food records and 24 h urine excretion were high (0.78-0.87). The correlations between nitrogen from estimated food diaries and urinary nitrogen were r = 0.60-0.70. Correlations with other methods were lower, but improved by energy adjustment, using residuals for those nutrients correlated with total energy, such as nitrogen and potassium, but not for nutrients not correlated with energy intake--for example, beta-carotene. Hence, the correlation between urinary nitrogen and unadjusted nitrogen from a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was 0.24 but improved with energy adjustment to 0.49. UK EPIC uses three methods (diary, improved FFQ and 24 h recall) to assess diet, with repeated measures from the food diary at 18 months and four years. Ninety-three percent of first food diaries are returned completed by participants. Results from 200 subjects randomly selected from the first 2,000 recruits suggest that differences between methods with improved FFQ design are less obvious than in the initial validation study. Results from the diary are more closely correlated with plasma carotenoids and vitamin C than other methods, although supplements of vitamin C are the main determinant of the magnitude of correlations. More detailed biomarker studies are in progress among EPIC participants.

摘要

营养摄入生物标志物被用于验证拟在欧洲饮食与癌症前瞻性研究(EPIC)中使用的膳食评估方法。在英国的验证研究中,通过称重食物记录和生物标志物、24小时尿氮、钾以及血浆类胡萝卜素和维生素C来评估几种测试方法的准确性。称重食物记录中的膳食氮摄入量与24小时尿排泄量之间的相关性很高(0.78 - 0.87)。估计食物日记中的氮与尿氮之间的相关性为r = 0.60 - 0.70。与其他方法的相关性较低,但通过能量调整得到改善,对于那些与总能量相关的营养素(如氮和钾)使用残差进行调整,而对于与能量摄入无关的营养素(如β - 胡萝卜素)则不进行调整。因此,食物频率问卷(FFQ)中未调整的氮与尿氮之间的相关性为0.24,但经能量调整后提高到了0.49。英国EPIC使用三种方法(日记法、改进的FFQ和24小时回顾法)来评估饮食,在18个月和4年时对食物日记进行重复测量。93%的第一份食物日记由参与者填写并返回。从最初的2000名招募者中随机选取的200名受试者的结果表明,改进后的FFQ设计方法之间的差异不如初始验证研究中那么明显。日记法的结果与血浆类胡萝卜素和维生素C的相关性比其他方法更紧密,尽管维生素C补充剂是相关性大小的主要决定因素。EPIC参与者中正在进行更详细的生物标志物研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验