Suppr超能文献

全面医疗保健审计系统:一种用于英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)医疗机构临床实践评估与发展的系统方法。

The Total Health Care Audit System: a systematic methodology for clinical practice evaluation and development in NHS provider organizations.

作者信息

Miles A, Bentley P, Price N, Polychronis A, Grey J, Asbridge J

机构信息

Centre for the Advancement of Clinical Practice, European Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, UK.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 1996 Feb;2(1):37-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00027.x.

Abstract

Writing in Medical Education in 1982, Fowkes (1982) noted the lack of general agreement within the medical profession on methods of audit, a deficiency previously articulated by Shaw (1980) and later emphasized by McIntyre (1985). More recently, a study by Black & Thompson (1993) of consultant and junior medical staff in four London district general hospitals revealed that 'many doctors did not understand how to undertake audit', and major research by both Hopkins (1993, 1994) and Buttery et al. (1994) described a multiplicity of methodological deficiencies in the general approaches to audit adopted by clinicians since the promulgation of the White Paper definition in 1989. Soundness of methodological approach is fundamental to securing the success of clinical audit within Provider organizations and is thus central to the generation of measurable improvements in the quality of clinical care being delivered to patients. It is therefore disturbing that methodological deficiencies may still be observed in general approaches to audit (Buttery et al. 1994), with no author yet recommending a formal system for critical inquiry into clinical practice. It was the recognition of the unsatisfactory nature of this situation which led us to develop a system aimed at assessing, in a critical fashion, the quality of the totality of care dispensed within NHS provider organizations. The system is presented here for the first time.

摘要

福克斯在1982年发表于《医学教育》的文章中指出,医学界对于审核方法缺乏普遍共识,肖在1980年曾指出过这一缺陷,麦金太尔在1985年也强调过这一点。最近,布莱克和汤普森对伦敦四家地区综合医院的顾问医生和初级医务人员进行的一项研究表明,“许多医生不明白如何进行审核”,霍普金斯以及巴特里等人的主要研究描述了自1989年白皮书定义颁布以来临床医生采用的一般审核方法存在多种方法学缺陷。方法学方法的合理性对于在医疗机构中确保临床审核的成功至关重要,因此对于提高提供给患者的临床护理质量的可衡量改进至关重要。因此,令人不安的是,在一般审核方法中仍可能观察到方法学缺陷(巴特里等人,1994年),而且尚无作者建议建立一个对临床实践进行批判性探究的正式系统。正是认识到这种情况的不令人满意的性质,才促使我们开发了一个系统,旨在以批判性的方式评估国民保健服务(NHS)医疗机构内提供的整体护理质量。该系统在此首次介绍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验