Neumann C, Schmid H
Serviço de Endocrinologia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
Braz J Med Biol Res. 1997 Feb;30(2):197-205. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x1997000200007.
The objectives of the present study were 1) to compare results obtained by the traditional manual method of measuring heart rate (HR) and heart rate response (HRR) to the Valsalva maneuver, standing and deep breathing, with those obtained using a computerized data analysis system attached to a standard electrocardiograph machine; 2) to standardize the responses of healthy subjects to cardiovascular tests, and 3) to evaluate the response to these tests in a group of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). In all subjects (97 healthy and 143 with DM) we evaluated HRR to deep breathing. HRR to standing, HRR to the Valsalva maneuver, and blood pressure response (BPR) to standing up and to a sustained handgrip. Since there was a strong positive correlation between the results obtained with the computerized method and the traditional method, we conclude that the new method can replace the traditional manual method for evaluating cardiovascular responses with the advantages of speed and objectivity. HRR and BPR of men and women did not differ. A correlation between age and HRR was observed for standing (r = -0.48, P < 0.001) and deep breathing (r = -0.41; P < 0.002). Abnormal BPR to standing was usually observed only in diabetic patients with definite and severe degrees of autonomic neuropathy.
1)比较通过传统手动方法测量心率(HR)以及心率对瓦尔萨尔瓦动作、站立和深呼吸的反应(HRR)所获得的结果,与使用连接到标准心电图机的计算机数据分析系统所获得的结果;2)使健康受试者对心血管测试的反应标准化;3)评估一组糖尿病(DM)患者对这些测试的反应。在所有受试者(97名健康者和143名糖尿病患者)中,我们评估了深呼吸时的HRR、站立时的HRR、瓦尔萨尔瓦动作时的HRR以及站立和持续握力时的血压反应(BPR)。由于计算机化方法和传统方法所获得的结果之间存在很强的正相关,我们得出结论,新方法可以取代传统手动方法来评估心血管反应,具有速度和客观性方面的优势。男性和女性的HRR和BPR没有差异。观察到站立时年龄与HRR之间存在相关性(r = -0.48,P < 0.001),深呼吸时也存在相关性(r = -0.41;P < 0.002)。站立时异常的BPR通常仅在患有明确且严重程度的自主神经病变的糖尿病患者中观察到。