Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert A J, Nigg B M, Lundberg A, Murphy N
Human Performance Laboratory, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Biomech. 1997 Jul;30(7):729-32. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00001-8.
It is not known how well skin markers represent the skeletal knee joint motion during running. Hence the purpose of this investigation was to compare the skin marker derived tibiofemoral motion with the skeletal tibiofemoral motion during running. In addition to skin markers attached to the shank and thigh, triads of reflective markers were attached to bone pins inserted into the tibia and femur. Three-dimensional kinematics of the stance phase of five running trials were recorded for three subjects using high-speed cine cameras (200 Hz). The knee motion was expressed in terms of Cardan angles calculated from both the external and skeletal markers. Good agreement was present between the skin and bone marker based knee flexion/extension. For abduction/adduction and internal/external knee rotation, the difference between skeletal and external motion was large compared to the amplitude of these motions. Average errors relative to the range of motion during running stance were 21% for flexion/extension, 63% for internal/external rotation, and 70% for abduction/adduction. The errors were highly subject dependent preventing the realization of a successful correction algorithm. It was concluded that knee rotations other than flexion/extension may be affected with substantial errors when using skin markers.
目前尚不清楚在跑步过程中皮肤标记物能多好地反映膝关节的骨骼运动。因此,本研究的目的是比较跑步过程中皮肤标记物得出的胫股关节运动与骨骼胫股关节运动。除了在小腿和大腿上附着皮肤标记物外,还将三个反射标记物附着在插入胫骨和股骨的骨针上。使用高速电影摄像机(200Hz)记录了三名受试者五次跑步试验站立阶段的三维运动学。膝关节运动通过根据外部和骨骼标记物计算出的卡尔丹角来表示。基于皮肤和骨骼标记物的膝关节屈伸之间存在良好的一致性。对于外展/内收和膝关节内/外旋转,与这些运动的幅度相比,骨骼运动和外部运动之间的差异很大。相对于跑步站立阶段的运动范围,屈伸的平均误差为21%,内/外旋转为63%,外展/内收为70%。这些误差高度依赖于个体,这使得无法实现成功的校正算法。得出的结论是,在使用皮肤标记物时,除屈伸之外的膝关节旋转可能会受到较大误差的影响。