Zambrano E, Barrios-de-Tomasi J, Cárdenas M, Ulloa-Aguirre A
Department of Reproductive Biology, Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Mol Hum Reprod. 1996 Aug;2(8):563-71. doi: 10.1093/molehr/2.8.563.
In the present study, we analysed and compared the relative in-vitro biological activity of the various intrapituitary human follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) isoforms employing two different bioassay systems. FSH was fractionated by chromatofocusing (pH range 7.10 to < 3.80) and the several isoforms isolated were quantified at multiple dose levels by three highly specific immunoassay systems: radioimmunoassay (RIA), enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) and immunoradiometric assay (IRMA), as well as by two in-vitro bioassays, one that measures the amount of oestrogen produced by rat granulosa cells in culture and the other that determines the amount of cAMP produced by a human fetal cell line (293) expressing the recombinant human FSH receptor. The relative in-vitro biological activity of each FSH isoform, expressed as the bioassay/ immunoassay (B/I) activity ratio (B/RIA, B/EIA and B/IRMA ratios) varied with its elution pH value. Regardless of the immunoassay or bioassay method employed, less acidic FSH isoforms exhibited higher B/I ratios than their more acidic counterparts [B/RIA, B/EIA and B/IRMA ratios for isoforms with elution pH values > 4.5 = 1.05 +/- 0.13, 0.99 +/- 0.10 and 1.15 +/- 0.08 (rat oestrogen bioassay), and 2.75 +/- 0.34, 2.20 +/- 0.25 and 2.96 +/- 0.35 (human cAMP production bioassay) respectively. Ratios for isoforms with pH values < 4.5 = 0.71 +/- 0.06, 0.47 +/- 0.05 and 0.63 +/- 0.06 (rat oestrogen assay), and 1.80 +/- 0.26, 1.10 +/- 0.09 and 1.44 +/- 0.13 (cAMP assay) respectively (P < 0.05 for isoforms with pH < 4.5 compared with those isoforms with pH > 4.5)]. Furthermore, statistically significant direct relationships between the B/RIA, B/EIA and B/IRMA ratios and elution pH value of each isoform was identified by regression analysis [rat assay: r = 0.844, 0.800 and 0.780 (P < 0.01); human assay: r = 0.730, 0.845 and 0.821 (P < 0.01), for their corresponding B/RIA, B/EIA and B/IRMA ratios respectively]. The finding of significant differences in relative in-vitro biological potency among the various intrapituitary FSH isoforms strongly suggests that the shifts towards the production and secretion of more basic or acidic FSH molecules occurring in certain specific physiological conditions (e.g. puberty and menstrual cycle), may represent an important mechanism through which the anterior pituitary regulates gonadal function.
在本研究中,我们采用两种不同的生物测定系统,分析并比较了垂体中各种人卵泡刺激素(FSH)亚型的相对体外生物活性。通过色谱聚焦法(pH范围7.10至<3.80)对FSH进行分离,分离出的几种亚型通过三种高度特异性免疫测定系统在多个剂量水平进行定量:放射免疫测定(RIA)、酶免疫测定(EIA)和免疫放射测定(IRMA),以及两种体外生物测定,一种测量培养的大鼠颗粒细胞产生的雌激素量,另一种测定表达重组人FSH受体的人胎儿细胞系(293)产生的环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)量。每种FSH亚型的相对体外生物活性,以生物测定/免疫测定(B/I)活性比(B/RIA、B/EIA和B/IRMA比值)表示,随其洗脱pH值而变化。无论采用何种免疫测定或生物测定方法,酸性较弱的FSH亚型比酸性较强的对应亚型表现出更高的B/I比值[洗脱pH值>4.5的亚型的B/RIA、B/EIA和B/IRMA比值分别为1.05±0.13、0.99±0.10和1.15±0.08(大鼠雌激素生物测定),以及2.75±0.34、2.20±0.25和2.96±0.35(人cAMP产生生物测定)。pH值<4.5的亚型的比值分别为0.71±0.06、0.47±0.05和0.63±0.06(大鼠雌激素测定),以及1.80±0.26、1.10±0.09和1.44±0.13(cAMP测定)(pH<4.5的亚型与pH>4.5的亚型相比,P<0.05)]。此外,通过回归分析确定了每种亚型的B/RIA、B/EIA和B/IRMA比值与洗脱pH值之间具有统计学意义的直接关系[大鼠测定:r = 0.844、0.800和0.780(P<0.01);人测定:r = 0.730、0.845和0.821(P<0.01),分别对应其B/RIA、B/EIA和B/IRMA比值]。垂体中各种FSH亚型之间相对体外生物活性存在显著差异这一发现,强烈表明在某些特定生理条件(如青春期和月经周期)下,向产生和分泌更多碱性或酸性FSH分子的转变,可能是垂体前叶调节性腺功能的重要机制。