Santini F, Luciani G B, Pessotto R, Faggian G, Prioli A, Fabbri A, Campanile F, Mazzucco A
Divisione e Cattedra di Cardiochirurgia, Università degli Studi, Verona.
G Ital Cardiol. 1997 Feb;27(2):141-5.
Early and long term results after surgical replacement of the aortic valve depend to a large degree on the type of valve substitute used. Pulmonary autograft offers many theoretical advantages, particularly in young patients.
Between July 1994 and August 1996, 15 patients (12 male) with a mean age of 28 +/- 6 years (range 14 to 36 years) were selected for aortic valve replacement with a pulmonary autograft. The aortic valve disease was isolated insufficiency in 7 cases (47%), stenosis in 3 (20%) and mixed lesion in 5 (33%). One patient in the last group had bacterial endocarditis (Streptococcus mitis). Seven patients (47%) had a bicuspid aortic valve. In 3 cases (20%) the autograft was inserted as a scalloped subcoronary implant. Twelve patients (80%) had total aortic root replacement with re-implantation of the coronary ostia. The right ventricular outflow tract was reconstructed with a cryopreserved homograft (13 pulmonary; 2 aortic). The aortic cross-clamp time was 156 +/- 18 minutes with a total bypass time of 221 +/- 26 minutes.
All patients survived the operation. Three postoperative bleeding (20%) necessitated re-exploration. Mean post-operative hospital stay was 10 +/- 2 days. All patients were discharged on aspirin for the period of three months. One patient (7%) with moderate neo-aortic valve insufficiency died suddenly 11 months post-operatively. All survivors are asymptomatic, in NYHA FC 1 at a mean follow-up time of 15.7 months. Freedom from reoperation, valve related complication and endocarditis is 100%. Two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiography six months postoperatively showed a mean left ventricular outflow gradient of 13 +/- 4 mmHg with no evidence of aortic regurgitation in 11 cases (78.5%) and trivial in 3 (21.5%).
Although the Ross operation is technically more challenging and requires a longer operating time than standard procedures, this does not seem to affect early mortality and morbidity. Clinical and haemodynamic results appear to be gratifying. Continued patients evaluation particularly with regard to evidence of valve degeneration and arrhythmias in the long term is warranted.
